From: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, olof@lixom.net, broonie@kernel.org,
david.griego@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: ftrace: adjust callsite addresses examined by stack tracer
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:15:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BB42EDAB-830D-4073-859A-6454E6B9EB4D@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444298504-10392-2-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
On Oct 8, 2015, at 7:01 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Hi Akashi,
> On arm64, no PC values returned by save_stack_trace() will match to LR
> values saved in stack frames on a stack after the following commit:
> commit e306dfd06fcb ("ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation")
> As a result, the output from stack tracer will be messed up.
>
> This patch introduces an arch-defined macro, FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET,
> so that check_stack() can handle this case correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 7 +++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index c5534fa..2b43e20 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,9 @@
>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
>
> -#define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)_mcount)
> -#define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE
> +#define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)_mcount)
> +#define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE
> +#define FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET AARCH64_INSN_SIZE
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 407991b..bc0689a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
>
> +#include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -49,10 +50,10 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
> frame->sp = fp + 0x10;
> frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp);
> /*
> - * -4 here because we care about the PC at time of bl,
> - * not where the return will go.
> + * decrement PC by AARCH64_INSN_SIZE here because we care about
> + * the PC at time of bl, not where the return will go.
> */
> - frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8) - 4;
> + frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8) - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 6cd8c0e..d77b195 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,13 @@ static inline void ftrace_kill(void) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_TRACER
> +/*
> + * the offset value to add to return address from save_stack_trace()
> + */
> +#ifndef FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET
> +#define FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET 0
> +#endif
> +
> extern int stack_tracer_enabled;
> int
> stack_trace_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> index b746399..30521ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
>
> /* Skip over the overhead of the stack tracer itself */
> for (i = 0; i < max_stack_trace.nr_entries; i++) {
> - if (stack_dump_trace[i] == ip)
> + if ((stack_dump_trace[i] + FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET) == ip)
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
> for (; p < top && i < max_stack_trace.nr_entries; p++) {
> if (stack_dump_trace[i] == ULONG_MAX)
> break;
> - if (*p == stack_dump_trace[i]) {
> + if (*p == (stack_dump_trace[i]
> + + FTRACE_STACK_FRAME_OFFSET)) {
> stack_dump_trace[x] = stack_dump_trace[i++];
> this_size = stack_dump_index[x++] =
> (top - p) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> --
This change is always on my tree for IRQ stack feature development. It makes
stack_trace prints out useful info although it can't give an accurate data.
I believe this hunk helps to figure out max stack depth context.
Acked-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
Thanks!
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-08 10:01 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from " AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: ftrace: adjust callsite addresses examined by " AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-13 15:15 ` Jungseok Lee [this message]
2015-10-13 15:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-10-14 5:09 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: ftrace: modify a stack frame in a safe way AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-09 6:46 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13 15:24 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-10-14 5:03 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: ftrace: allow for tracing leaf functions AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ftrace: allow arch-specific stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-13 15:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: insn: add instruction decoders for ldp/stp and add/sub AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-08 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: ftrace: add arch-specific stack tracer AKASHI Takahiro
2015-10-09 6:41 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-08 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from " Jungseok Lee
2015-10-22 14:05 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-10-28 15:23 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-29 5:24 ` AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BB42EDAB-830D-4073-859A-6454E6B9EB4D@gmail.com \
--to=jungseoklee85@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.griego@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®