From: Shuangpeng <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Fix CEP reference race in siw_accept()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:09:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BBA21909-6E49-442D-8B59-48C7249ED71C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ecec6f-1a88-44a5-a089-951c757f95f3@linux.dev>
Hi Bernard,
Thanks for your reply.
After carefully rechecking the code path, I realized that I had
overlooked synchronization mechanisms: the RDMA core serializes
application QP destruction with iw_cm_accept(), while peer-side teardown
is serialized by siw_cep_set_inuse() and siw_cep_set_free().
Therefore, the concurrent QP-destroy path described in this follow-up
patch is not reachable in the current implementation.
Please disregard my follow-up patch. I apologize for the confusion.
Thanks again for pointing this out.
Best regards,
Shuangpeng
> On Aug 21, 2026, at 11:34, Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 16.08.2026 08:13, Shuangpeng Bai wrote:
>> siw_accept() associates a CEP with the selected QP while holding
>> qp->state_lock. If the transition to RTS fails, the error path releases
>> the lock before detaching that association.
>> The cleanup drops the QP association reference before clearing qp->cep.
>> A concurrent QP destroy can acquire qp->state_lock in between, observe
>> the stale pointer, and drop the same association reference again. This
>> can free the CEP before siw_accept() releases its remaining reference,
>> causing a use-after-free.
>
> Do we have a stack trace for that use-after-free?>
>> Serialize the error-side detachment with qp->state_lock and clear qp->cep
>> before dropping the association reference. This ensures that either the
>> accept cleanup or QP teardown removes the association, but not both.
>> This is a follow-up to commit a93949718259 ("RDMA/siw: Fix
>> use-after-free in siw_accept()") and addresses a separate race in the
>> same error path.
>> Fixes: 6c52fdc244b5 ("rdma/siw: connection management")
>> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260801213632.1086548-1-shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Shuangpeng Bai <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> index 0245b25e7271..da1b953f3fa3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
>> @@ -1751,11 +1751,13 @@ int siw_accept(struct iw_cm_id *id, struct iw_cm_conn_param *params)
>> cep->state = SIW_EPSTATE_CLOSED;
>> siw_free_cm_id(cep);
>
> What can destroy the QP at this point?
> An appication QP destroy shall be serialized with this
> accept call by the RDMA core.
>
> A concurrent connection drop by peer side would affect
> QP state, but is serialized at the cep using
> siw_cep_set_inuse()/_free() I don't see other cases
> which are not serialized...?
>> + down_write(&qp->state_lock);
>
>> if (qp->cep == cep) {
>> - siw_cep_put(cep);
>> qp->cep = NULL;
>> + siw_cep_put(cep);
>> }
>> cep->qp = NULL;
>> + up_write(&qp->state_lock);
>> siw_qp_put(qp);
>> free_cep:
>> siw_cep_set_free_and_put(cep);
>> base-commit: a9394971825933074032794a5feee5211509c774
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 6:13 Shuangpeng Bai
2026-08-21 15:34 ` Bernard Metzler
2026-08-21 16:09 ` Shuangpeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BBA21909-6E49-442D-8B59-48C7249ED71C@gmail.com \
--to=shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bernard.metzler@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®