mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"940821@bugs.debian.org" <940821@bugs.debian.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: NFS Caching broken in 4.19.37
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:16:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BEBA9809-373A-4172-B4AD-E19D82E56DB1@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af5cebbd-74c9-9345-9fe8-253fb96033f6@cambridgegreys.com>



> On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> wrote:
> 
> On 20/02/2021 20:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>> 
>>> NFS caching appears broken in 4.19.37.
>>> 
>>> The more cores/threads the easier to reproduce. Tested with identical
>>> results on Ryzen 1600 and 1600X.
>>> 
>>> 1. Mount an openwrt build tree over NFS v4
>>> 2. Run make -j `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep vendor | wc -l` ; make clean in a
>>> loop
>>> 3. Result after 3-4 iterations:
>>> 
>>> State on the client
>>> 
>>> ls -laF /var/autofs/local/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/linux-ar71xx_tiny/linux-4.14.125/arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm
>>> 
>>> total 8
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ./
>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ../
>>> 
>>> State as seen on the server (mounted via nfs from localhost):
>>> 
>>> ls -laF /var/autofs/local/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/linux-ar71xx_tiny/linux-4.14.125/arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm
>>> total 12
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ./
>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ../
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 anivanov anivanov   32 Jul  8 11:40 ipcbuf.h
>>> 
>>> Actual state on the filesystem:
>>> 
>>> ls -laF /exports/work/src/openwrt/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/linux-ar71xx_tiny/linux-4.14.125/arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm
>>> total 12
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ./
>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 anivanov anivanov 4096 Jul  8 11:40 ../
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 anivanov anivanov   32 Jul  8 11:40 ipcbuf.h
>>> 
>>> So the client has quite clearly lost the plot. Telling it to drop caches and
>>> re-reading the directory shows the file present.
>>> 
>>> It is possible to reproduce this using a linux kernel tree too, just takes
>>> much more iterations - 10+ at least.
>>> 
>>> Both client and server run 4.19.37 from Debian buster. This is filed as
>>> debian bug 931500. I originally thought it to be autofs related, but IMHO it
>>> is actually something fundamentally broken in nfs caching resulting in cache
>>> corruption.
>> According to the reporter downstream in Debian, at
>> https://bugs.debian.org/940821#26 thi seem still reproducible with
>> more recent kernels than the initial reported. Is there anything Anton
>> can provide to try to track down the issue?
>> 
>> Anton, can you reproduce with current stable series?
> 
> 100% reproducible with any kernel from 4.9 to 5.4, stable or backports. It may exist in earlier versions, but I do not have a machine with anything before 4.9 to test at present.

Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux
NFS client maintainers be Cc'd?


> From 1-2 make clean && make  cycles to one afternoon depending on the number of machine cores. More cores/threads the faster it does it.
> 
> I tried playing with protocol minor versions, caching options, etc - it is still reproducible for any nfs4 settings as long as there is client side caching of metadata.
> 
> A.
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Salvatore
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Anton R. Ivanov
> Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
> https://www.cambridgegreys.com/

--
Chuck Lever




  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-20 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 18:19 Anton Ivanov
2021-02-20 20:04 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-02-20 20:13   ` Anton Ivanov
2021-02-20 20:16     ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2021-02-21  9:13       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-02-21 11:38         ` Anton Ivanov
2021-02-21 14:37           ` Bruce Fields
2021-02-21 15:53             ` Anton Ivanov
2021-02-26 15:03               ` Timo Rothenpieler
2021-02-26 15:40                 ` Anton Ivanov
2021-02-26 15:48                   ` Timo Rothenpieler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BEBA9809-373A-4172-B4AD-E19D82E56DB1@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=940821@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=carnil@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®