From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261891AbVE0GQ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 02:16:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261824AbVE0GQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 02:16:25 -0400 Received: from miranda.se.axis.com ([193.13.178.8]:51151 "EHLO miranda.se.axis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261891AbVE0GQK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 02:16:10 -0400 From: "Mikael Starvik" To: Cc: Subject: [RFC] Introducing a new sub-architecture Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:15:56 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm about to submit a new sub-architecture under arch/cris and I would like to get your input on how this is best done. I can see at least 3 alternatives: 1. All the patches goes to LKML. Lots of boring patches that most people doesn't care about. 2. Send drivers to the driver subsystems maintainers for review and then a big .tgz to Andrew. 3. Send the .tgz directly to Andrew without reviews from the driver guys. I leaning towards option 2, comments? Except from the new sub-architecture there will also be patches to the generic cris parts to add support for e.g. SMP and to convert to the new IRQ framework. Thanks! /Mikael