mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minfei Huang <minfei.huang@hotmail.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: x86: make kASLR logic more accurate
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:11:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP213C66FCD75B22DB4B91E2F94EB0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504242157480.3695@pobox.suse.cz>

On 04/24/15 at 09:59P, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> We give up old_addr hint from the coming patch module in cases when kernel load
> base has been randomized (as in such case, the coming module has no idea about
> the exact randomization offset).
> 
> We are currently too pessimistic, and give up immediately as soon as 
> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set; this doesn't however directly imply that the 
> load base has actually been randomized. There are config options that 
> disable kASLR (such as hibernation), user could have disabled kaslr on 
> kernel command-line, etc.
> 
> The loader propagates the information whether kernel has been randomized 
> through bootparams. This allows us to have the condition more accurate.
> 
> On top of that, it seems unnecessary to give up old_addr hints even if 
> randomization is active. The relocation offset can be computed as 
> difference between _text start and __START_KERNEL, and therefore old_addr 
> can be adjusted accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: I accidentally used kgr_ suffix (which we use in kGraft) instead 
> 	  of klp_ in v1.
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h | 4 ++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c      | 5 +++++
>  kernel/livepatch/core.c          | 5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> index 2d29197..84a3247 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -23,8 +23,12 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +
> +extern unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void);
> +
>  static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
>  {
>  #ifndef CC_USING_FENTRY
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> index ff3c3101d..6df7902 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> @@ -88,3 +88,8 @@ int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void)
> +{
> +	return (unsigned long)&_text - __START_KERNEL;
> +}

Is it possible to put above function into arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h?
It is more elegant, so that the function is re-used by other module.

> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index 284e269..ff4c35c 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -234,8 +234,9 @@ static int klp_find_verify_func_addr(struct klp_object *obj,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)
> -	/* KASLR is enabled, disregard old_addr from user */
> -	func->old_addr = 0;
> +	/* If KASLR has been enabled, adjust old_addr accordingly */
> +	if (kaslr_enabled())
> +		func->old_addr += klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset();

Since KASLR only works for x86 arch now, it is better to put it into the
specfied arch (x86 now), or implement a weak function to let be overwritten
by specified arch.

Thanks
Minfei

>  #endif
>  
>  	if (!func->old_addr || klp_is_module(obj))
> 
> -- 
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-25  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-24 19:53 [PATCH] " Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 19:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 21:40   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-04-25 20:39     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 21:55   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-04-25 20:42     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-25  3:11   ` Minfei Huang [this message]
2015-04-25 20:44     ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BLU436-SMTP213C66FCD75B22DB4B91E2F94EB0@phx.gbl \
    --to=minfei.huang@hotmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®