From: Minfei Huang <minfei.huang@hotmail.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: x86: make kASLR logic more accurate
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:11:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP213C66FCD75B22DB4B91E2F94EB0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504242157480.3695@pobox.suse.cz>
On 04/24/15 at 09:59P, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> We give up old_addr hint from the coming patch module in cases when kernel load
> base has been randomized (as in such case, the coming module has no idea about
> the exact randomization offset).
>
> We are currently too pessimistic, and give up immediately as soon as
> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set; this doesn't however directly imply that the
> load base has actually been randomized. There are config options that
> disable kASLR (such as hibernation), user could have disabled kaslr on
> kernel command-line, etc.
>
> The loader propagates the information whether kernel has been randomized
> through bootparams. This allows us to have the condition more accurate.
>
> On top of that, it seems unnecessary to give up old_addr hints even if
> randomization is active. The relocation offset can be computed as
> difference between _text start and __START_KERNEL, and therefore old_addr
> can be adjusted accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2: I accidentally used kgr_ suffix (which we use in kGraft) instead
> of klp_ in v1.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c | 5 +++++
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> index 2d29197..84a3247 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -23,8 +23,12 @@
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +
> +extern unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void);
> +
> static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
> {
> #ifndef CC_USING_FENTRY
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> index ff3c3101d..6df7902 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> @@ -88,3 +88,8 @@ int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void)
> +{
> + return (unsigned long)&_text - __START_KERNEL;
> +}
Is it possible to put above function into arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h?
It is more elegant, so that the function is re-used by other module.
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index 284e269..ff4c35c 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -234,8 +234,9 @@ static int klp_find_verify_func_addr(struct klp_object *obj,
> int ret;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)
> - /* KASLR is enabled, disregard old_addr from user */
> - func->old_addr = 0;
> + /* If KASLR has been enabled, adjust old_addr accordingly */
> + if (kaslr_enabled())
> + func->old_addr += klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset();
Since KASLR only works for x86 arch now, it is better to put it into the
specfied arch (x86 now), or implement a weak function to let be overwritten
by specified arch.
Thanks
Minfei
> #endif
>
> if (!func->old_addr || klp_is_module(obj))
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-25 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 19:53 [PATCH] " Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 19:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 21:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-04-25 20:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-24 21:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-04-25 20:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-25 3:11 ` Minfei Huang [this message]
2015-04-25 20:44 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BLU436-SMTP213C66FCD75B22DB4B91E2F94EB0@phx.gbl \
--to=minfei.huang@hotmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®