From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753326AbbDASUa (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:20:30 -0400 Received: from blu004-omc2s5.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.80]:64572 "EHLO BLU004-OMC2S5.hotmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751952AbbDASU3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:20:29 -0400 X-TMN: [RobestSaHprMUZ/Fmp8gtqkIo96bPTvp] X-Originating-Email: [xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 02:20:26 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Salter CC: a-jacquiot@ti.com, "linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Bernd Schmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] c6x: platforms: cache: Export symbol L1P_cache_block_invalidate and L1D_cache_block_writeback References: <54F6AD4B.8080607@hotmail.com> <1427381926.9430.50.camel@deneb.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2015 18:20:27.0264 (UTC) FILETIME=[8737F000:01D06CA8] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/1/15 03:19, Chen Gang wrote: > On 3/27/15 05:31, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 3/26/15 22:58, Mark Salter wrote: >>> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 15:05 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>>> They are needed by other modules, the related error with allmodconfig: >>>> >>>> MODPOST 3327 modules >>>> ERROR: "L1P_cache_block_invalidate" [drivers/misc/lkdtm.ko] undefined! >>>> ERROR: "L1D_cache_block_writeback" [drivers/misc/lkdtm.ko] undefined! >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang >>>> --- >>> >>> Thanks! I added this to the c6x tree for next merge window. >>> The related binutils patch is merged into the latest binutils tree. At present, we can use the latest gcc/binutils to cross compile c6x with allmodconfig successfully. :-) Thanks. > > Sorry, I did not finish the gcc/binutils issues on time. > > - For binutils patch, it is fixed by me, it is passed binutils related > member's first checking, I guess it can correctly fix the related > issue (although may still need improvement). It is in attachment. > > - For gcc, it is fixed by c6x gcc related member and it is integrated > into gcc main line. (I sent fix patch for it, but my original patch > is incorrect). > > I guess, I reported issues and sent patches were too late. And next I > should report and send fix patches in time (within 20??-??-20), so can > leave a little more time to others for reviewing and integrating > >> >> Thank you for your work for all the related patches. And I am analyzing >> related c6x gcc/binutils issues: >> >> - For binutils/ld issue, I have sent fix patch for it, the patch is OK >> (really fix the root cause), but need some additional improvement, I >> shall sent patch v2 for it within this month. >> >> - For gcc issue, I am analyzing, hope I can find root cause today, and >> send fix patch within this month. >> >> >> Thanks. >> > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed