From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755036Ab1BYHKU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:10:20 -0500 Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:49278 "EHLO mail-px0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751938Ab1BYHKT (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:10:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=GdAmeq531g4AiL+VUn/jPlJx96z5vg41nOtbpXYUD1bBHy/Fj5oW8lc8HDb/gj3Fg4 4Wwktg1UxeatjcN+RxxEdKmfDOnYjkSfBAUP7ndCZBgFNYW/b6UzL5uPiNR8jfMK2qgr wA2Eouq2k4hH1vxPf13SdGiJ3Yq68nWMV1uK0= Cc: trivial@kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: From: Justin Mattock To: Julian Calaby In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21]include:net:mac80211.h remove one to many l's in the word. Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:10:15 -0800 References: <1298614522-4153-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Julian Calaby wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 17:15, Justin P. Mattock > wrote: >> The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word. > > Random thought: > > Not that I'm complaining about your work here, and not that commits > are a finite resource, but would it be possible for you to collect > your spelling changes into slightly bigger commits before sending them > off? > > E.g. instead of sending off 21 patches to remove 21 erroneous l's, why > not do a full spelling check on these 21 files, then send off 21 > patches to fix *all* the spelling mistakes in each file? You could > even group them up by directory if you liked. > > Thanks, > > -- > > Julian Calaby > > Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com > Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ > .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ yeah.. I agree, its just people have said that I should individually send each patch to each maintainer subsystem etc... (rather would just send one with everything on it, but then might make things more confusing) Justin P. Mattock