From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752797Ab2AJFuT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:50:19 -0500 Received: from db3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.139]:47527 "EHLO DB3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752215Ab2AJFuS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:50:18 -0500 X-SpamScore: -6 X-BigFish: VPS-6(zz9371I542M98dKzz1202hzzz2dhc1ahc1bh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3h944hbe9k) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:59.163.77.45;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:Outbound.kpitcummins.com;RD:59.163.77.45.static.vsnl.net.in;EFVD:NLI X-FB-SS: 13, From: Ashish Jangam To: Mark Brown CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dajun , "arnd@arndb.de" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , Stephen Rothwell , Anton Vorontsov Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/06] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v9 Added ADC support Thread-Topic: [PATCH 02/06] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v9 Added ADC support Thread-Index: AQHMzx9O3kEcgQOzrUSKyg5TJEaugZYFF9uA Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:50:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1326098770.3542.31.camel@dhruva> <20120109223725.GG30766@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20120109223725.GG30766@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.10.38.22] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: kpitcummins.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:07 AM To: Ashish Jangam Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dajun; arnd@arndb.de; sameo@linux.intel.com; Stephen Rothwell; Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/06] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v9 Added ADC support On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:16:10PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote: > Re-submitting the patch. >>This is patch 2/6 - where are patches 1 and 3-6? Patch 1 and 3-6 are already ACK'ed and got merged. Since patch 2/6 was not merged therefore got re-submitted.