From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jon Mason <mason@myri.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pci: Clamp pcie_set_readrq() when using "performance" settings
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:51:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyV9uqTt6UHA2wsAdRHHCSAtCSmoO2d3dm62HAo+s75Sg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317744493.29415.238.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, bcrl argues that patches 1-2 of 3 are actively wrong.
>
> This is an argument that isn't finished :-)
Oh, I absolutely *hope* it isn't finished, but there's no way I'm
applying a patch for -rc9 that people are still actively arguing
whether it's at all valid or not.
Which is why I'm planning on applying 3/3 just to make the whole issue
irrelevant for 3.1, and then the people who want to test things out
can apply whatever patches they want and play with the kernel command
line options to actually enable whatever behavior they are testing.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 14:50 Jon Mason
2011-10-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-04 15:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-04 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-04 15:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-10-04 16:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-04 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-10-04 17:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-04 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-05 7:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-05 14:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-05 16:26 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-10-04 17:41 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2011-10-03 21:55 ` Jon Mason
2011-10-04 14:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2011-10-04 15:37 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2011-10-04 15:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-04 15:59 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2011-10-04 16:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-10-04 16:44 ` Benjamin LaHaise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFyV9uqTt6UHA2wsAdRHHCSAtCSmoO2d3dm62HAo+s75Sg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@myri.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome