From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: check if protocol extracted by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto is correct
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:02:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdXP-nOMWjw0hML3eOhFpApZLZhgENub7fLAUn3DMHmBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309062116-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:26 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:31:25AM +0100, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> > For gso packets, virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets the protocol (if it isn't
> > set) based on the type in the virtio net hdr, but the skb could contain
> > anything since it could come from packet_snd through a raw socket. If
> > there is a mismatch between what virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets and
> > the actual protocol, then the skb could be handled incorrectly later
> > on.
> >
> > An example where this poses an issue is with the subsequent call to
> > skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic which relies on skb->protocol being set
> > correctly. A specially crafted packet could fool
> > skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic preventing EINVAL to be returned.
> >
> > Avoid blindly trusting the information provided by the virtio net header
> > by checking that the protocol in the packet actually matches the
> > protocol set by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto. Note that since the protocol
> > is only checked if skb->dev implements header_ops->parse_protocol,
> > packets from devices without the implementation are not checked at this
> > stage.
> >
> > Fixes: 9274124f023b ("net: stricter validation of untrusted gso packets")
> > Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/virtio_net.h | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > index e8a924eeea3d..6c478eee0452 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -79,8 +79,14 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > if (gso_type && skb->network_header) {
> > struct flow_keys_basic keys;
> >
> > - if (!skb->protocol)
> > + if (!skb->protocol) {
> > + const struct ethhdr *eth = skb_eth_hdr(skb);
> > + __be16 etype = dev_parse_header_protocol(skb);
> > +
> > virtio_net_hdr_set_proto(skb, hdr);
> > + if (etype && etype != skb->protocol)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
>
> Well the protocol in the header is an attempt at an optimization to
> remove need to parse the packet ... any data on whether this
> affecs performance?
This adds a branch and reading a cacheline that is inevitably read not
much later. It shouldn't be significant.
And this branch is only taken if skb->protocol is not set. So the cost
can easily be avoided by passing the information.
But you raise a good point, because TUNTAP does set it, but only after
the call to virtio_net_hdr_to_skb.
That should perhaps be inverted (in a separate net-next patch).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 10:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: prevent infinite loop caused by incorrect proto from virtio_net_hdr_set_proto Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: check if protocol extracted by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto is correct Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-09 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-09 14:02 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2021-03-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: avoid infinite loop in mpls_gso_segment when mpls_hlen == 0 Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-08 16:17 ` David Ahern
2021-03-08 16:26 ` Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:42 ` David Ahern
2021-03-08 18:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+FuTSdXP-nOMWjw0hML3eOhFpApZLZhgENub7fLAUn3DMHmBg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bnemeth@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®