mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: check if protocol extracted by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto is correct
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:02:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdXP-nOMWjw0hML3eOhFpApZLZhgENub7fLAUn3DMHmBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309062116-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:26 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:31:25AM +0100, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> > For gso packets, virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets the protocol (if it isn't
> > set) based on the type in the virtio net hdr, but the skb could contain
> > anything since it could come from packet_snd through a raw socket. If
> > there is a mismatch between what virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets and
> > the actual protocol, then the skb could be handled incorrectly later
> > on.
> >
> > An example where this poses an issue is with the subsequent call to
> > skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic which relies on skb->protocol being set
> > correctly. A specially crafted packet could fool
> > skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic preventing EINVAL to be returned.
> >
> > Avoid blindly trusting the information provided by the virtio net header
> > by checking that the protocol in the packet actually matches the
> > protocol set by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto. Note that since the protocol
> > is only checked if skb->dev implements header_ops->parse_protocol,
> > packets from devices without the implementation are not checked at this
> > stage.
> >
> > Fixes: 9274124f023b ("net: stricter validation of untrusted gso packets")
> > Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/virtio_net.h | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > index e8a924eeea3d..6c478eee0452 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -79,8 +79,14 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >               if (gso_type && skb->network_header) {
> >                       struct flow_keys_basic keys;
> >
> > -                     if (!skb->protocol)
> > +                     if (!skb->protocol) {
> > +                             const struct ethhdr *eth = skb_eth_hdr(skb);
> > +                             __be16 etype = dev_parse_header_protocol(skb);
> > +
> >                               virtio_net_hdr_set_proto(skb, hdr);
> > +                             if (etype && etype != skb->protocol)
> > +                                     return -EINVAL;
> > +                     }
>
>
> Well the protocol in the header is an attempt at an optimization to
> remove need to parse the packet ... any data on whether this
> affecs performance?

This adds a branch and reading a cacheline that is inevitably read not
much later. It shouldn't be significant.

And this branch is only taken if skb->protocol is not set. So the cost
can easily be avoided by passing the information.

But you raise a good point, because TUNTAP does set it, but only after
the call to virtio_net_hdr_to_skb.

That should perhaps be inverted (in a separate net-next patch).

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08 10:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: prevent infinite loop caused by incorrect proto from virtio_net_hdr_set_proto Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: check if protocol extracted by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto is correct Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:01   ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-09 11:26   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-09 14:02     ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2021-03-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: avoid infinite loop in mpls_gso_segment when mpls_hlen == 0 Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:07   ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-08 16:17     ` David Ahern
2021-03-08 16:26       ` Balazs Nemeth
2021-03-08 16:42         ` David Ahern
2021-03-08 18:11           ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+FuTSdXP-nOMWjw0hML3eOhFpApZLZhgENub7fLAUn3DMHmBg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bnemeth@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®