From: Bui Duc Phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regcache: disable cache_only before rewriting paging registers
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:59:46 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAABR9nHWV_qMWaYOeWroU6cPH3n3pDjbafHmXMeMVfiqC562Aw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <687d81be-566c-481a-9ece-08526c33ff91@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Yes, calling regcache_sync() with the cache enabled is not particularly
> sensible - it basically exists to put all the changes made while a
> device was in cache only mode (including due to suspend which is the
> main case for that) onto the device.
That was actually my understanding as well. Initially, I was considering a
patch that would make it unnecessary to explicitly call
regcache_cache_only(map, true) again when regcache_sync() fails.
The idea was roughly:
1. check cache_only at the beginning of regcache_sync(), and if it is
already true, emit a warning and return immediately;
2. if regcache_sync() fails, automatically restore cache_only = true
before returning.
However, after reviewing the existing users of regcache_sync(), I found
that there are several drivers that call regcache_sync() without first calling
regcache_cache_only(map, false). That made me think such a change
could break existing users, so I decided not to pursue that approach.
If the intended usage is indeed that regcache_cache_only(map, false) should
always be set before regcache_sync() is ever used, then I'm happy to revisit
this approach and also prepare follow-up patches for the drivers that don't
currently follow that pattern.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on whether that would be the right direction.
Best regards,
Phuc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 7:30 phucduc.bui
2026-07-13 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-13 13:07 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-07-13 13:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-13 14:59 ` Bui Duc Phuc [this message]
2026-07-13 15:06 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-13 21:58 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-07-14 11:23 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-14 23:02 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAABR9nHWV_qMWaYOeWroU6cPH3n3pDjbafHmXMeMVfiqC562Aw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox