From: 임준서 <zirajs7@gmail.com>
To: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject negative optlen in cgroup getsockopt hook
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 17:26:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB4FuGYv8eUAWzJZB7HbOTktYq-RKB35roAqsT52WxHh_P3VJg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DKBDNFB3WGPZ.GS7M7MY2HNAB@etsalapatis.com>
Thanks for the review.
The reproducer already sets ctx->optlen to a negative value (-11) in
the cgroup BPF program:
/* ctx->optlen = -11; */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -11),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2,
offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, optlen)),
https://gist.github.com/ZirAjs/a177ec6d8f2c8ed7d93edca6313a9255
The PASS/FAIL output only checks the behavior before and after applying the
patch. Without the patch, the negative value reaches copy_to_sockptr() and
triggers the warning. With the patch, getsockopt() rejects it with -EFAULT.
Would you prefer that I include the reproducer directly in the patch
submission rather than only linking to the gist?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 6:36 AM Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun Jul 26, 2026 at 3:01 AM EDT, Junseo Lim wrote:
> > A cgroup getsockopt BPF program can shrink ctx->optlen after the
> > kernel getsockopt handler has run. The kernel-buffer variant, used by
> > TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, only rejects values larger than the original
> > length.
> >
> > If BPF writes a negative optlen, that value is accepted and propagated
> > back to the TCP getsockopt code. It can then be passed to
> > copy_to_sockptr() as a size_t and trigger the hardened usercopy
> > bytes > INT_MAX warning.
> >
> > Reject negative ctx.optlen in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern(),
> > matching the lower-bound validation already present in the sockptr-based
> > getsockopt hook.
> >
> > Fixes: 9cacf81f8161 ("bpf: Remove extra lock_sock for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE")
> > Signed-off-by: Junseo Lim <zirajs7@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
>
> It'd be worth resending with a reproducer setting optlen to negative.
>
> > ---
> > Reproducer and warning:
> > https://gist.github.com/ZirAjs/a177ec6d8f2c8ed7d93edca6313a9255
> >
> > Tested by building and booting the patched kernel. The reproducer
> > returns -EFAULT and no longer triggers the hardened usercopy warning.
> >
> > kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > index 4355ccb78a9c..c04a244fe2e6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > @@ -2235,7 +2235,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern(struct sock *sk, int level,
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - if (ctx.optlen > *optlen)
> > + if (ctx.optlen > *optlen || ctx.optlen < 0)
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > /* BPF programs can shrink the buffer, export the modifications.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-26 7:01 Junseo Lim
2026-07-29 21:36 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-08-01 8:26 ` 임준서 [this message]
2026-08-05 19:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAB4FuGYv8eUAWzJZB7HbOTktYq-RKB35roAqsT52WxHh_P3VJg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zirajs7@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®