From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid setting SBI_NEED_FSCK on transient resize failure with -EAGAIN
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:21:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACOAw_xSS78P_c8ZWXGDadxa+xFAVWWN0kAx1QMrujVuruBYsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b55a4e9-e4a0-421c-9bb6-98ffc2c915c9@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 7:34 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/19/26 01:05, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> >
> > When f2fs_resize_fs() fails due to transient lock contention or retryable
> > GC failure in free_segment_range() returning -EAGAIN, no filesystem
> > metadata has been modified on-disk yet. The filesystem remains completely
> > consistent and clean.
>
> Any way to make sure EAGAIN is from free_segment_range(), in case we return
> EAGAIN from 1) any other places that we may miss to check now or 2) we changed
> the code to return EAGAIN in future.
Makes sense.
In fact, if free_segment_range() fails with ANY error (e.g., -EAGAIN,
-ENOMEM, -ERESTARTSYS, etc.), no on-disk superblock or filesystem metadata
has been modified yet, and free_segment_range() safely restores all in-memory
counters (MAIN_SECS, free_sections) before returning. Therefore, setting
SBI_NEED_FSCK is not needed for all errors occurring in free_segment_range().
To make this explicit and defensive against any future changes, we can
separate the error recovery path with dedicated labels as follows:
err = free_segment_range(sbi, secs, false);
if (err)
- goto recover_out;
+ goto recover_user_blocks;
update_sb_metadata(sbi, -secs);
...
recover_out:
+ set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
+ f2fs_err(sbi, "resize_fs failed, should run fsck to repair!");
+recover_user_blocks:
clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS);
if (err) {
- set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
- f2fs_err(sbi, "resize_fs failed, should run fsck to repair!");
-
spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
sbi->user_block_count += shrunk_blocks;
spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > However, the current error recovery path unconditionally sets the
> > SBI_NEED_FSCK flag on any error, forcing an unnecessary and time-consuming
> > fsck.f2fs repair on the subsequent mount/reboot.
> >
> > Fix this by guarding set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK) with
> > `if (err != -EAGAIN)`, avoiding false-positive filesystem corruption
> > flags on transient resize retries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index 192b16ac02f8..787133ee2eb2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -2446,8 +2446,10 @@ int f2fs_resize_fs(struct file *filp, __u64 block_count)
> > recover_out:
> > clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS);
> > if (err) {
> > - set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > - f2fs_err(sbi, "resize_fs failed, should run fsck to repair!");
> > + if (err != -EAGAIN) {
> > + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > + f2fs_err(sbi, "resize_fs failed, should run fsck to repair!");
> > + }
> >
> > spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> > sbi->user_block_count += shrunk_blocks;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 17:05 Daeho Jeong
2026-08-19 2:34 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2026-08-19 18:21 ` Daeho Jeong [this message]
2026-08-20 7:20 ` Chao Yu
[not found] ` <CABdZyexzNgVLcdSFRkt=AZnkgW5Q40m3Hf8JFk63WuTGhQ0S7w@mail.gmail.com>
2026-08-20 16:14 ` Daeho Jeong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACOAw_xSS78P_c8ZWXGDadxa+xFAVWWN0kAx1QMrujVuruBYsQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daeho43@gmail.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®