From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965142Ab3E2RzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 13:55:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:46878 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934979Ab3E2RzU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 13:55:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1369793454-19197-4-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> References: <1369793454-19197-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> <1369793454-19197-4-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 19:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip: Make versatile fpga irq driver a generic chip From: Linus Walleij To: Grant Likely Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Russell King Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > This is an RFC patch to convert the versatile FPGA irq controller driver > to use generic irq chip. It builds on the series that extends the > generic chip code to allow a linear irq domain to contain one or more > generic irq chips so that each interrupt controller doesn't need to hand > code the generic chip setup. > > I've written this as a proof of concept to see if the new generic irq > code does what it needs to. I had to extend it slightly to properly > handle the valid mask used by the versatile FPGA driver. > > Tested on QEMU, but not on real hardware. Hm, I could test this but what is the needed baseline? I think I need Thomas' patches underneath right? Could you publish a branch that I can test? Yours, Linus Walleij