From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1C6C31E46 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6320874 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="W1Zi7sy9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436745AbfFLH57 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:59 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com ([209.85.208.174]:42552 "EHLO mail-lj1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436729AbfFLH56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:58 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t28so14203511lje.9 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hu5mYy1Aik4aGPpt9uX6kLLpSvEpnab82Qz7EMOsZ3s=; b=W1Zi7sy9qLC8jVk3nI8TRNpGFhYFOg7/lKaQRrKAONX2MyAFj2Lxo/XZLD7w9L9J7G 4HYzdvdsUG1/nA6PskBT2Pr7ZmrNoSE/oO7BZSxQg0QizW2L9D2Ggzgd2EO6fVqvIE1L zKWQOcKKgkm5x997Hyd3bJaqGq8QHPX1IVzJy9BU19gJUn4CtAijTcv4GDZm/PKjp/q+ M0GG5oMeL0QsLX/oHElAhFI1DN1MWe+Xe7KcLbp9lLt3IgDbDZXdaZz1wuIs1rwn41Rg GwxUnKxkTbajCy/iDW6NUVvfR37huqzvfE4N+QRN73y1wWkSrzq4SWgd5sRV/NMwzdtE 6pFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hu5mYy1Aik4aGPpt9uX6kLLpSvEpnab82Qz7EMOsZ3s=; b=ISdlbtPpLmeW5Oc79EFgFx9zZ1molQOtTSq+21a2bmd2D2A4YlqxNzGdCdN8Ca5Msc XvcBQSX9AlEEvQ7ZaGZUQt2PDNUDgD8gpnW7EqkjsLJwdUMPEbZU7N8SrcM8ZzP4i1MS iMr2ilBN485DUsOBYEMzDToAwcpLGgc9lSsgPQlAnBUBKv6Vfk9g6NoAQACvFNGrwxcL nVKWz1E3nFKTxtZUZHY404lkcBx31/DXK2rGcs5LcGVX0Dx4nf2zCXffAZ/dGxIBAtOT WUsgxNHqTlJsXzYNpBuZT8xPzgHYECr+SPeuwaMwKLgD2weCGmVc8vM70M9VsoNGlfrE yjvg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8szPjAYePSCwUtPSttE+V0tJc9I22QWi364YyGxgmMgZfxpK+ HyRmC4dFyjdY+aIiXJN/+CYvNiGC3jG9OKsJAW2t0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxl+ZtAXPoKQZGqWkavmG+pD5XFEpR1tkG2C7EK7lnCxHlD6+0qWESpsMmznMtDhMWnyXc7r0iAy9Bqcf/Y/90= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9753:: with SMTP id f19mr3842459ljj.113.1560326276665; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:57:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190610171103.30903-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20190610171103.30903-5-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <20190610171103.30903-5-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH-next 04/20] gpio: gpio-omap: clean up edge interrupt handling To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Russell King , Tony Lindgren , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux-OMAP , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Santosh Shilimkar , Russell King Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Grygorii Strashko wrote: > From: Russell King > > The edge interrupt handling was effectively: > > isr = ISR_reg & enabled; > if (bank->level_mask) > level_mask = bank->level_mask & enabled; > else > level_mask = 0; > > edge = isr & ~level_mask; > > When bank->level_mask is zero, level_mask will be computed as zero > anyway, so the if() statement is redundant. We are then left with: > > isr = ISR_reg & enabled; > level_mask = bank->level_mask & enabled; > edge = isr & ~level_mask; > > This can be simplified further to: > > isr = ISR_reg & enabled; > edge = isr & ~bank->level_mask; > > since the second mask with 'enabled' is redundant. > > Improve the associated comment as well. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij