From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756025Ab3BEPOB (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:14:01 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:50560 "EHLO mail-ie0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755667Ab3BEPOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:14:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1359720305-31933-11-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> References: <1359720305-31933-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1359720305-31933-11-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:13:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] PINCTRL: lantiq: fix pin number in ltq_pmx_gpio_request_enable From: Linus Walleij To: John Crispin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Langer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:05 PM, John Crispin wrote: > The mapping logic inside ltq_pmx_gpio_request_enable() was broken. This only > effected Falcon SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Langer > Signed-off-by: John Crispin Applied as well. But now I have no longer any clue on if this is a regression or not... Yours, Linus Walleij