From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755185Ab2DMMfu (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:35:50 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:38017 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752638Ab2DMMft (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:35:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1334199051.8736.3.camel@phoenix> References: <1334199051.8736.3.camel@phoenix> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:35:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Sort Kconfig entries for mfd drivers From: Linus Walleij To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Axel Lin wrote: > Sort Kconfig entries by chip vendor name first, then driver name. > Having the Kconfig entries sorted makes it easier for users to find the > driver they want to enable. > This change also encourages new coming drivers to be put in proper location > rather than to be added at random location. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > Hi Samuel, > I generate this patch against linux-next 20120411. > If you think this patch is ok, pls apply this one and > ignore my previous patch "mfd: Move MFD_TPS65090 and > TPS65911_COMPARATOR Kconfig entries to proper location". This is going to cause a number of merge conflicts for upcoming patches from my side, I'd really like this to go into the -rc:s if accepted so I can rely on it being present as a merge base. Yours, Linus Walleij