From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754171AbaE1Pm5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 11:42:57 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:41555 "EHLO mail-vc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753430AbaE1Pm4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 11:42:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1401289778-9840-1-git-send-email-dongsu.park@profitbricks.com> References: <20140527112459.GF2205@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com> <1401289778-9840-1-git-send-email-dongsu.park@profitbricks.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 23:42:55 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] bio: decrease bi_iter.bi_size by len in the fail path From: Ming Lei To: Dongsu Park Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Jet Chen , Maurizio Lombardi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dongsu, On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Dongsu Park wrote: > From: Dongsu Park > > Commit 3979ef4dcf3d1de55a560a3a4016c30a835df44d ("bio-modify- > __bio_add_page-to-accept-pages-that-dont-start-a-new-segment-v3") > introduced a regression as reported by Jet Chen. > That results in a kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166. > > To fix that, bi_iter.bi_size must be decreased by len, before > recounting the number of physical segments. > > Tested on with kernel 3.15.0-rc7-next-20140527 on qemu guest, > by running xfstests/ext4/271. > > Cc: Jens Axboe > Cc: Jet Chen > Cc: Maurizio Lombardi > Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park > --- > block/bio.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c > index 0443694ccbb4..67d7cba1e5fd 100644 > --- a/block/bio.c > +++ b/block/bio.c > @@ -810,6 +810,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page > bvec->bv_len = 0; > bvec->bv_offset = 0; > bio->bi_vcnt--; > + bio->bi_iter.bi_size -= len; Would you mind explaining why bi_iter.bi_size need to be decreased by 'len'? In the failure path, it wasn't added by 'len', was it? Thanks, -- Ming Lei