From: Jesse Taube <jtaubepe@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix flex array member not at end
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:45:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADRr4beNdQL86RokX9O4+2Ar-C7fL=9m6ALiCnXcR=Ht1PU+pg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202607150914.6C4DD9DE03@keescook>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 12:16 PM Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
> > In qla_edif_bsg.h: `struct fc_bsg_reply` and `struct fc_bsg_request`
> > have flexible array members, thus they must be the last member of
> > the parent structure. Contininging in the effort to add
> > `-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end`, move the structs to the end of
> > the parent structures, `struct qla_bsg_auth_els_reply` and
> > `struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request `.
> >
> > Suggested-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jtaubepe@redhat.com>
>
> It feels like this structure is part of the hardware spec? (and therefore
> cannot be re-ordered.) I'm not sure at all, though, but it looks like
> it's part of request serialization:
I looked at the code closer and i relized this structure is passed to userspace.
I sent a patch V2 after i relized that though i accidentally kept the
commit description the same.
In the lpfc driver here you can see how `bsg_job->reply` is supossed to be used.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.10/source/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c#L662
the layout of `bsg_job->reply` is defined in `struct fc_bsg_reply`,
the `struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request`
data should have been put in the flex-array called `vendor_rsp` so
`(struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request *)bsg_job->request->vendor_reply->vendor_rsp;
unfortunatly because of `vendor_reply` and `ctels_reply` being in a
union the actuall vendor data from
`struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request` is offset by the size of
`ctels_reply`, this can be seen in V2 of this patch
AFAIK this isn't leaking data.
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260714185621.610105-1-jtaubepe@redhat.com/
Thanks,
Jesse Taube
> $ git grep 'qla_bsg_auth_els_request' | grep '>request'
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c: (struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request *)bsg_job->request;
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c: (struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request *)bsg_job->request;
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c: (struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request *)bsg_job->request;
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c: (struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request *)bsg_job->request;
>
> -Kees
>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> > index 514c265ba86e..bcc35d149c1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif_bsg.h
> > @@ -36,16 +36,16 @@ struct extra_auth_els {
> > } __packed;
> >
> > struct qla_bsg_auth_els_request {
> > - struct fc_bsg_request r;
> > struct extra_auth_els e;
> > + struct fc_bsg_request r;
> > };
> >
> > struct qla_bsg_auth_els_reply {
> > - struct fc_bsg_reply r;
> > uint32_t rx_xchg_address;
> > uint8_t version;
> > uint8_t pad[VND_CMD_PAD_SIZE];
> > uint8_t reserved[VND_CMD_APP_RESERVED_SIZE];
> > + struct fc_bsg_reply r;
> > };
> >
> > struct app_id {
> > --
> > 2.54.0
> >
>
> --
> Kees Cook
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 15:22 Jesse Taube
2026-07-15 16:16 ` Kees Cook
2026-07-17 15:45 ` Jesse Taube [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADRr4beNdQL86RokX9O4+2Ar-C7fL=9m6ALiCnXcR=Ht1PU+pg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jtaubepe@redhat.com \
--cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mr.bossman075@gmail.com \
--cc=njavali@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox