Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add a ksym BPF iterator

[Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 10:58 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/1/22 2:26 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> > > add a "ksym" iterator which provides access to a "struct kallsym_iter"
> > > for each symbol.  Intent is to support more flexible symbol parsing
> > > as discussed in [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YjRPZj6Z8vuLeEZo@krava/
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   kernel/kallsyms.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/kallsyms.c b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> > > index fbdf8d3..8b662da 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/kallsyms.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > >   #include <linux/module.h>
> > >   #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >   #include <linux/bsearch.h>
> > > +#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> > >
> > >   /*
> > >    * These will be re-linked against their real values
> > > @@ -799,6 +800,91 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> > >       .show = s_show
> > >   };
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> > > +
> > > +struct bpf_iter__ksym {
> > > +     __bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_iter_meta *, meta);
> > > +     __bpf_md_ptr(struct kallsym_iter *, ksym);
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int ksym_prog_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, bool in_stop)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct bpf_iter__ksym ctx;
> > > +     struct bpf_iter_meta meta;
> > > +     struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > > +
> > > +     meta.seq = m;
> > > +     prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, in_stop);
> > > +     if (!prog)
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     ctx.meta = &meta;
> > > +     ctx.ksym = m ? m->private : NULL;
> > > +     return bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int bpf_iter_ksym_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +     return ksym_prog_seq_show(m, false);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void bpf_iter_ksym_seq_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +     if (!p)
> > > +             (void) ksym_prog_seq_show(m, true);
> > > +     else
> > > +             s_stop(m, p);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_ksym_ops = {
> > > +     .start = s_start,
> > > +     .next = s_next,
> > > +     .stop = bpf_iter_ksym_seq_stop,
> > > +     .show = bpf_iter_ksym_seq_show,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int bpf_iter_ksym_init(void *priv_data, struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct kallsym_iter *iter = priv_data;
> > > +
> > > +     reset_iter(iter, 0);
> > > +
> > > +     iter->show_value = true;
> >
> > I think instead of always having show_value = true, we should have
> >     iter->show_value = kallsyms_show_value(...);
> >
> > this is consistent with what `cat /proc/kallsyms` is doing, and
> > also consistent with bpf_dump_raw_ok() used when dumping various
> > kernel info in syscall.c.
> >
> > We don't have a file here, so credential can be from the current
> > process with current_cred().
>
> This seems wrong to use current_cred(). show_value is used to not
> "leak" pointer values to unprivileged user-space, right? In our case
> BPF iterator is privileged, so there is no need to hide (or mangle,
> didn't check) values.
>
> If it happens that a privileged process loads iter/ksym program and
> then passes prog FD to unprivileged one to read iterator output,
> iter/ksym should still get correct symbol values.
>
> I think the initial approach with show_value = true is the right one
> -- give all the information as it is to BPF iterator.

Ok, I should have looked at the selftest first. Seems like this just
passes indicator to iter/ksym program and program can choose to ignore
it, if necessary. In which case I retract my comment, sorry :)

>
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC(ksym, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct kallsym_iter *ksym)
> > > +
> > > +static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info ksym_iter_seq_info = {
> > > +     .seq_ops                = &bpf_iter_ksym_ops,
> > > +     .init_seq_private       = bpf_iter_ksym_init,
> > > +     .fini_seq_private       = NULL,
> > > +     .seq_priv_size          = sizeof(struct kallsym_iter),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static struct bpf_iter_reg ksym_iter_reg_info = {
> > > +     .target                 = "ksym",
> > > +     .ctx_arg_info_size      = 1,
> > > +     .ctx_arg_info           = {
> > > +             { offsetof(struct bpf_iter__ksym, ksym),
> > > +               PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL },
> > > +     },
> > > +     .seq_info               = &ksym_iter_seq_info,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +BTF_ID_LIST(btf_ksym_iter_id)
> > > +BTF_ID(struct, kallsym_iter)
> > > +
> > > +static void __init bpf_ksym_iter_register(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     ksym_iter_reg_info.ctx_arg_info[0].btf_id = *btf_ksym_iter_id;
> > > +     if (bpf_iter_reg_target(&ksym_iter_reg_info))
> > > +             pr_warn("Warning: could not register bpf ksym iterator\n");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
> > > +
> > >   static inline int kallsyms_for_perf(void)
> > >   {
> > >   #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > > @@ -885,6 +971,9 @@ const char *kdb_walk_kallsyms(loff_t *pos)
> > >   static int __init kallsyms_init(void)
> > >   {
> > >       proc_create("kallsyms", 0444, NULL, &kallsyms_proc_ops);
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
> > > +     bpf_ksym_iter_register();
> >
> > You can inline this function here and if bpf_iter_reg_target(...)
> > failed, just return the error code.
> >
> > > +#endif
> > >       return 0;
> > >   }
> > >   device_initcall(kallsyms_init);