mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
To: daan@amutable.com
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: allow reflinks into NODATASUM files
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:06:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEg-Je86cbtNvESfK5MeVXVezZfMFE8qVdX900F3ayQsC+yQNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260712-reflink-into-nodatasum-v1-0-9f27ef836073@amutable.com>

On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 10:25 AM Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
<devnull+daan.amutable.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The primary use case for this series is building a NOCOW VM image from
> individual partition images that are COW and checksummed. Today those
> partitions cannot be cloned into the NODATACOW and NODATASUM destination,
> so tools fall back to a full copy. This makes provisioning slower and
> duplicates all of the image data up front.
>
> Allow cloning and deduplication from a checksummed file into a NODATASUM
> file. The VM image can then share extents with the partition images.
> Existing checksummed extents are COWed once when modified, protecting the
> source checksums, while newly allocated extents use the destination's
> normal NOCOW behavior.
>
> The reverse direction remains rejected because the destination would
> expect checksums that do not exist.
>
> Patch 1 prevents swap activation from bypassing the COW protection when a
> NODATASUM file references checksummed extents. Patch 2 relaxes the reflink
> restriction in the safe direction.
>
> The xfstests branch is available at:
> https://github.com/kdave/xfstests/pull/6
>
> Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan@amutable.com>
> ---
> Daan De Meyer (2):
>       btrfs: reject swapfile activation if any extent has checksums
>       btrfs: allow reflinking from checksummed files into nodatasum files
>
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: cab9e339cfbc1a4e075e53e281dfb00391e1a6bb
> change-id: 20260712-reflink-into-nodatasum-aff962f3794e
>

The patch series looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>

That said, I have a question: Is there no reason we couldn't reflink
into a checksummed area and generate *new* checksums for that purpose?
That would be useful for staging for regular backup.

I can foresee that being useful for archiving OS trees or VM images as
snapshots by creating checksums for the newly created snapshots...



--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-12 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-12 14:25 Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-07-12 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject swapfile activation if any extent has checksums Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-07-12 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: allow reflinking from checksummed files into nodatasum files Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-07-12 15:06 ` Neal Gompa [this message]
2026-07-12 22:18   ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: allow reflinks into NODATASUM files Qu Wenruo
2026-07-13  2:45     ` Neal Gompa
2026-07-12 21:42 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEg-Je86cbtNvESfK5MeVXVezZfMFE8qVdX900F3ayQsC+yQNg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=neal@gompa.dev \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=daan@amutable.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox