mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
	 Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: fix NULL pointer dereference in selinux_sctp_bind_connect()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:12:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEjxPJ40fKJbDFobsxoos0CvWqi0FfL6Sd5xkpRY=g5Ukyfnag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618232149.1780219-1-tristmd@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 7:21 PM Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
>
> selinux_sctp_bind_connect() reads sk->sk_socket and passes it to
> selinux_socket_bind() or selinux_socket_connect_helper() without
> checking for NULL.  When an SCTP ASCONF chunk is processed in softirq
> context on a socket that has been concurrently closed, sock_orphan()
> will have already set sk->sk_socket to NULL.  The subsequent
> dereference of sock->sk at offset 0x18 triggers a kernel panic.
>
> Add a NULL check on sk->sk_socket before use.

Is this sufficient, or can the sk_socket be freed under us after the assignment?
Do different callers of this hook provide different guarantees
regarding sk_socket or are they all the same?

>
> Fixes: d452930fd3b9 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
>  security/selinux/hooks.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 0f704380a8c8..e45588563caa 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -5717,6 +5717,9 @@ static int selinux_sctp_bind_connect(struct sock *sk, int optname,
>
>         /* Process one or more addresses that may be IPv4 or IPv6 */
>         sock = sk->sk_socket;
> +       if (!sock)
> +               return -ECONNRESET;
> +
>         addr_buf = address;
>
>         while (walk_size < addrlen) {
> --
> 2.47.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-18 23:21 Tristan Madani
2026-06-22 14:12 ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2026-06-22 18:59   ` Tristan Madani
2026-06-22 19:15     ` Stephen Smalley
2026-06-22 19:38       ` Stephen Smalley
2026-06-22 21:03 ` [PATCH v2] selinux: avoid sk_socket " Tristan Madani
2026-06-23 12:21   ` Stephen Smalley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEjxPJ40fKJbDFobsxoos0CvWqi0FfL6Sd5xkpRY=g5Ukyfnag@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=richard_c_haines@btinternet.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
    --cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox