From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
To: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx91-11x11-frdm: fix CAN transceiver gpio
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 13:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZD2CvQLO2hBDbX2H8PeeNkzQmLoK6jzeF6HKw8HHa8ukg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260115-imx91_fix-v1-1-9351c3fac76a@valla.it>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 8:25 PM Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it> wrote:
>
> According to the HW schematic, the CAN transceiver does not have an
> enable pin but a silent one. Fix the GPIO property name and polarity.
>
> Fixes: b4bf5e55899e ("arm64: dts: freescale: Add FRDM-IMX91 basic support")
Just for clarification GPIO 23 is connected to a pin named CAN_STBY.
So I wonder if it isn't
better to use standby-gpios instead of silent-gpios?
I am looking at FRDM-IMX91 schematic file SPF-94610_A1.pdf.
But on the other hand we have
static const struct can_transceiver_data tja1051_drvdata = {
» .flags = CAN_TRANSCEIVER_SILENT_PRESENT | CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT,
};
So TJA1051 is not advertised as having a stdby flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 17:41 Francesco Valla
2026-01-16 11:40 ` Daniel Baluta [this message]
2026-01-16 13:03 ` Francesco Valla
2026-01-16 13:15 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-01-18 6:32 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEnQRZD2CvQLO2hBDbX2H8PeeNkzQmLoK6jzeF6HKw8HHa8ukg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=francesco@valla.it \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®