From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754452AbaIVPZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:25:39 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:54960 "EHLO mail-qa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754423AbaIVPZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:25:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140922110522.GK1994@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1411003825-21521-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1411003825-21521-8-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20140919210313.GH19374@google.com> <20140922110522.GK1994@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:25:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr To: Liviu Dudau Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Russell King , linux-pci , Linus Walleij , Tanmay Inamdar , Grant Likely , Sinan Kaya , Jingoo Han , Kukjin Kim , Suravee Suthikulanit , linux-arch , LKML , Device Tree ML , LAKML , "grant.likely@linaro.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:22AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: >> > Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number >> > of a given device from DT. If the information is not present, >> > the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number. >> >> Is of_pci_get_domain_nr() used somewhere? If the use is in some future >> series, please mention it explicitly. I'm just trying to avoid merging >> unused code. > > It is used in the arm64 specific patch that I have dropped out of my > pull request. After discussions with Catalin I will add the patch back > into the tree that you've pulled from as he is OK with your tree carrying > the whole package. > > I need to ask for some guidance here: for addressing some of your comments > and Rob's I can add more patches in my v11 branch and you can pull them > when you think they are ready. But one of your comments was requesting > splitting a patch into two blocks - one that moves of_pci_range_to_resource() > into drivers/of/address.c and one that fixes it's behaviour - and I don't > know how you would like that handled. Should I revert the original patch > and add the new ones, or should I rebase the whole series into a different > branch that you can pull from? I guess the easiest thing is probably just to send a v12 series. I was hoping we were close enough for me to just hand-integrate minor tweaks into my branch, but I think that will just create more confusion. Bjorn