From: 陈豪 <jacobchen110@gmail.com>
To: Randy Li <ayaka@soulik.info>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, John.Youn@synopsys.com, kishon@ti.com,
felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
randy.li@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] usb: dwc2: assert phy reset when waking up in rk3288 platform
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:07:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFLEztRLJbMj-ttGBsCWCMW=+0N3bbMQ0c4YcgDyvUDYs1SSkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474743019-1050-3-git-send-email-ayaka@soulik.info>
2016-09-25 2:50 GMT+08:00 Randy Li <ayaka@soulik.info>:
> On the rk3288 USB host-only port (the one that's not the OTG-enabled
> port) the PHY can get into a bad state when a wakeup is asserted (not
> just a wakeup from full system suspend but also a wakeup from
> autosuspend).
>
> We can get the PHY out of its bad state by asserting its "port reset",
> but unfortunately that seems to assert a reset onto the USB bus so it
> could confuse things if we don't actually deenumerate / reenumerate the
> device.
>
> We can also get the PHY out of its bad state by fully resetting it using
> the reset from the CRU (clock reset unit) in chip, which does a more full
> reset. The CRU-based reset appears to actually cause devices on the bus
> to be removed and reinserted, which fixes the problem (albeit in a hacky
> way).
>
> It's unfortunate that we need to do a full re-enumeration of devices at
> wakeup time, but this is better than alternative of letting the bus get
> wedged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Li <ayaka@soulik.info>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> index d85c5c9..af27edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static void dwc2_handle_session_req_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> static void dwc2_handle_wakeup_detected_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> {
> int ret;
> + struct device_node *np = hsotg->dev->of_node;
>
> /* Clear interrupt */
> dwc2_writel(GINTSTS_WKUPINT, hsotg->regs + GINTSTS);
> @@ -379,6 +380,16 @@ static void dwc2_handle_wakeup_detected_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> /* Restart the Phy Clock */
> pcgcctl &= ~PCGCTL_STOPPCLK;
> dwc2_writel(pcgcctl, hsotg->regs + PCGCTL);
> +
> + /*
> + * It is a quirk in Rockchip RK3288, causing by
> + * a hardware bug. This will propagate out and
> + * eventually we'll re-enumerate the device.
> + * Not great but the best we can do.
> + */
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3288-usb"))
> + phy_reset(hsotg->phy);
It will call mutex_lock in phy_reset.
> +
> mod_timer(&hsotg->wkp_timer,
> jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(71));
> } else {
> --
> 2.7.4
>
What is the status of this patch?
Sleeping calls(phy_reset ==> mutex) shouldn't be used in irq handler.
Randy will correct that?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-15 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-24 18:50 [PATCH v8 0/3] the fixup for the USB HOST1 at " Randy Li
2016-09-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] phy: Add reset callback for not generic phy Randy Li
2016-09-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] usb: dwc2: assert phy reset when waking up in rk3288 platform Randy Li
2016-09-26 20:50 ` John Youn
2016-10-15 15:07 ` 陈豪 [this message]
2016-10-19 22:58 ` John Youn
2016-10-20 0:50 ` Randy Li
2016-09-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: Point rk3288 dwc2 usb at the full PHY reset Randy Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFLEztRLJbMj-ttGBsCWCMW=+0N3bbMQ0c4YcgDyvUDYs1SSkA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jacobchen110@gmail.com \
--cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=ayaka@soulik.info \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=randy.li@rock-chips.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®