mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization" is buggy
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:23:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHttsrZN09-_GXujv2H5gAORLHcO2onrotFND5GrDXRGRtFpJQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559916886.6132.52.camel@lca.pw>

Thanks for the further validation.

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 22:14, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
> Reverted the commit on the top of linux-next fixed the issue.
>
> With the commit (triggering the warning
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused)),
>
> # cat /proc/lockdep_stats
> lock-classes:                         1110 [max: 8192]
> stack-trace entries:                     0 [max: 524288]
> combined max dependencies:               1
> uncategorized locks:                     0
> unused locks:                         1110
> max locking depth:                      14
> debug_locks:                             0
>
> Without the commit (no warning),
>
> # cat /proc/lockdep_stats
> lock-classes:                         1110 [max: 8192]
> stack-trace entries:                  9932 [max: 524288]
> combined max dependencies:               1
> uncategorized locks:                  1113
> unused locks:                            0
> max locking depth:                      14
> debug_locks:                             1

Then it is obviously we are talking on different things; then it is
obviously a configuration problem. Fix will be posted soon.

Sorry the bug.

Thanks,
Yuyang

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-10  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 21:14 Qian Cai
2019-06-07  3:21 ` Yuyang Du
2019-06-07 14:14   ` Qian Cai
2019-06-10  2:23     ` Yuyang Du [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHttsrZN09-_GXujv2H5gAORLHcO2onrotFND5GrDXRGRtFpJQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®