From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B7BEB64D7 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344043AbjFPUGo (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:06:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230209AbjFPUGm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:06:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2c.google.com (mail-oa1-x2c.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F55359E for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2c.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1a2c9f087f0so1231053fac.3 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:06:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1686946000; x=1689538000; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OUAOcJJgWeLKPM/xF2GkuGhpodootZffZ1w5UrUmM2A=; b=SCP+UFTAEbi61pCdZMMomcocARY2TcdGTOInovhmvu9lJQPA5u0Jg0FfH9hS94x9LZ a5fHkaOxXIZM1PTjzY6SV7qbJC8ozcPe7u3+tKgAWg8UM4K+4dkPG6BkpV7Rf5jMhSZT kVV4tCydQ5aufNiRH539Q/F/j5pL0DaMqra+xpfcVLOv2rLnhsCASQEzPulILnYy382o /LDMkLbMrW4bZ3QLoABvZ8kQWA1l0vdD6chKvhxxxi+6lclB7lw+eK51DlTBHIqKad3R LIQPizamgh7ivl81+ZV+EF89XtZ1krd7N0ZVoVfk2mda4FVwWDaO5Aig2VQkzDMEj2hk b/ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686946000; x=1689538000; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=OUAOcJJgWeLKPM/xF2GkuGhpodootZffZ1w5UrUmM2A=; b=Q67uCgT4z53B1vdpn4ccAd8dewXPZ9+b7/TPgT0xTKVIShgmYAzfvA3/fErlLFtg6t zyzkRinrLTuF120dMEmnl3FC80ERQyB3B+3fVimby0mXSJVfcVmmYsAJdn9HfI7J2TRt iFtMNh4jw/c69AEeN1frA9pYkz0HmiZLb6L+AkCqPGKCVIp0rhVemVo8bhmSsWEilnf/ jz1mKZQararIpxi542USQ85/Cxhw/9kZPTR22q11/KyYnvYvYE7X0uZGiWrnDNg6bTIH KuhjcZjMZ2DPV3ssNt0xQvzFRq9QR50zao1JMoYH7/qT0+gfLNV5P27s3lULhHW4vgsJ yZRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzYV2bVjtiLNi0FHlLF2aw2r7MrQ+3dMxS5U0quBG1sDN2hNOso UMQ/9O1F0KQvlaZIER5JErHCcbR1rspvwO4MyFTkjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ75K3KBcIrOD/dTCPzbUfDJYBDcThDV31eSyMdQR30gv5EAxMrPJP3qrkBEZFYins48R5Wov/Uhfr+KXOuXKsU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:2e04:b0:1a6:8fa1:10b4 with SMTP id oi4-20020a0568702e0400b001a68fa110b4mr123529oab.37.1686946000401; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:06:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230616035813.255062-1-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <165dd295-1b3a-5062-772a-613a7bf6fd45@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Jassi Brar Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:06:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the Synquacer platform To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, masahisa.kojima@linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 11:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 16/06/2023 18:23, Jassi Brar wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 05:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > >> > >> On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@linaro.org wrote: > >>> From: Jassi Brar > >>> > >>> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer). > >>> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that. > >> > >> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The > >> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. > >> > > I can remove it, but I see many mentions like "Fix bindings for" "Add > > binding for" etc in the subject line. > > Can we fix them as well? > ?? > > > >> > >> Binding without it's user is usually useless. Where is the user? > >> > > It is required for SystemReady-2.0 certification. > > For what? If there is no user, it is not required for SR. We don't > document compatibles for something which does not exist in the projects. > The dts/dtsi for synquacer will be added later. I am sure you are aware that there are countless bindings without actual use in any dts/dtsi. When exactly did it become mandatory to have dts/dtsi for the bindings to be merged upstream? -j