Re: [PATCH] fuse: Consider the ->big_writes for allocing fuse_req when do writing

[Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:02 AM, majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> If fc->big_writes == 0, for write-operation it only do 4k in func fuse_fill_write_pages.
> So when alloc fuse_req,we should consider this restrict in order to
> do additional operations.
> The additional operations are memset-opeartion in func fuse_requenst_alloc and alloc more space if nr_pages is larger than FUSE_REQ_MIN_PAGES.

Your mailer is removing whitespace from the patch.   Anyway, I applied
it by hand, thanks.

Miklos

>
> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 34b80ba..c584a31 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -912,8 +912,13 @@ static ssize_t fuse_perform_write(struct file *file,
> do {
> struct fuse_req *req;
> ssize_t count;
> - unsigned nr_pages = fuse_wr_pages(pos, iov_iter_count(ii));
> + unsigned nr_pages;
>
> + if (!fc->big_writes)
> + nr_pages = 1;
> + else
> + nr_pages = fuse_wr_pages(pos, iov_iter_count(ii));
> +
> req = fuse_get_req(fc, nr_pages);
> if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(req);
> --
> 1.8.2.rc2.4.g7799588
>