Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] Documentation: iomap: update docs to reflect iomap_next model

[Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 12:27 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 05:09:33PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > Filesystems no longer pass a struct iomap_ops with separate
> > ->iomap_begin() and ->iomap_end() callbacks.  Instead, every iomap
> > operation takes a single iomap_next() callback directly. iomap_next()
> > finishes the previous mapping (if any) and produces the next one. Most
> > filesystems build it from begin and end helpers via the iomap_process()
> > helper.
> >
> > Update the iomap documentation to match this change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst    | 115 +++++++++++++-----
> >  .../filesystems/iomap/operations.rst          |  60 +++++----
> >  Documentation/filesystems/iomap/porting.rst   |  22 +++-
> >  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> > index 0f7672676c0b..7a37e303eea8 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> > @@ -75,7 +75,10 @@ At a high level, an iomap operation `looks like this
> >
> >  1. For each byte in the operation range...
> >
> > -   1. Obtain a space mapping via ``->iomap_begin``
> > +   1. Obtain the next space mapping via the ``iomap_next`` callback.
> > +      From the second iteration onwards this same callback first finishes
> > +      the previous mapping (committing or unreserving space as needed)
> > +      and then produces the next one.
> >
> >     2. For each sub-unit of work...
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +89,13 @@ At a high level, an iomap operation `looks like this
> >
> >     3. Increment operation cursor
> >
> > -   4. Release the mapping via ``->iomap_end``, if necessary
> > +iomap repeats this until the range is fully consumed.  The ``iomap_next``
> > +callback returns ``1`` while there is more of the range left to process,
> > +``0`` once it is fully consumed, and a negative errno on error.
>
> s/and/or/
>
> > +Filesystems rarely implement ``->iomap_next`` by hand. The ``iomap_process``
> > +helper implements the finish-then-produce sequence in +terms of two smaller
> > +callbacks, ``begin`` and ``end``. See `The Mapping Callback`_ below for more
> > +info.
>
> I wonder, under what circumstances would a filesystem /not/ use
> iomap_process()?

Hmm, maybe a situation where they need to share or carry some
filesystem-specific state / info between finishing the mapping and
producing the next one?

>
> >  Each iomap operation will be covered in more detail below.
> >  This library was covered previously by an `LWN article
> > @@ -189,7 +198,7 @@ The fields are as follows:
> >     * **IOMAP_DELALLOC**: A promise to allocate space at a later time
> >       ("delayed allocation").
> >       If the filesystem returns IOMAP_F_NEW here and the write fails, the
> > -     ``->iomap_end`` function must delete the reservation.
> > +     ``end`` function must delete the reservation.
> >       The ``addr`` field must be set to ``IOMAP_NULL_ADDR``.
> >
> >     * **IOMAP_MAPPED**: The file range maps to specific space on the
> > @@ -208,12 +217,12 @@ The fields are as follows:
> >
> >     * **IOMAP_INLINE**: The file range maps to the memory buffer
> >       specified by ``inline_data``.
> > -     For write operation, the ``->iomap_end`` function presumably
> > -     handles persisting the data.
> > +     For write operation, the ``end`` function presumably handles
> > +     persisting the data.
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but this should say "For write operations, the
> end function must persist the data" because iomap_writepages doesn't
> handle inline data.
>
> >       The ``addr`` field must be set to ``IOMAP_NULL_ADDR``.
> >
> >   * ``flags`` describe the status of the space mapping.
> > -   These flags should be set by the filesystem in ``->iomap_begin``:
> > +   These flags should be set by the filesystem in ``begin``:
>>
> > +``->iomap_next``
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +Each call must finish the previous mapping, if any, and then produce the
>
> Each call?  Oh, each implementation of ->iomap_next must finish the
> previous mapping.
>
> > +next mapping for the current iteration position described by ``iter``.
> > +The mapping is returned through ``iomap`` (and through ``srcmap`` for
> > +operations that read from one mapping while writing to another; see
> > +``begin`` below).
> >
> > -``->iomap_begin``
> > +The callback returns ``1`` to continue iterating, ``0`` once the file
> > +range has been fully consumed, and a negative errno on error.
>
> s/and/or/
>
> I think there should be a transition sentence here along the lines of
>
> "Most filesystems are not expected to implement all of these behaviors
> in ->iomap_next themselves.  They should instead call iomap_process as
> described below."
>
> Or demote the next section so it's more obvious that the "iomap_process"
> and "->iomap_next" sections aren't independent?
>

Sounds good, I'll incorporate all the suggestions you recommended.

Thanks,
Joanne