From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 12/12] mm/slab: stop allocating objcg pointers when unnecessary
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:46:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHuXu3BDf93zeBQWSW_k5wApegp44rHoZwk5Ym6xxbqEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-b4-objext_split-v1-12-9a49c4ccf4c3@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 3:11 AM Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
<vbabka@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Start using the slab_needs_objcg() helper to calculate slabobj_ext size.
> Caches that we know to never need objcg pointers (currently
> KMALLOC_NORMAL caches) will thus stop wasting memory on them when memory
> allocation profiling is enabled.
>
> For things to work properly, we need to also add slab_needs_objcg()
> checks to mem_cgroup_from_obj_slab() and memcg_slab_free_hook(), because
> when obj_exts array exists for a slab only due to mem_alloc profiling,
> we would otherwise attempt to access a non-existing objcg pointer in
> that slab.
>
> The function __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook() should not be possible to
> call for a slab where slab_needs_objcg() is false, but add a DEBUG_VM
> check there to prevent breaking this assumption accidentally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
The change looks nice and simple. I'll take some more time to check if
we missed anything.
Only one nit below.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++++++
> mm/slab.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> mm/slub.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 6303a2b1a9d0..09659722ec85 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2871,6 +2871,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_obj_slab(struct slab *slab, void *p)
> if (!obj_exts)
> return NULL;
>
> + if (!slab_needs_objcg(slab))
> + return NULL;
> +
> get_slab_obj_exts(obj_exts);
> obj_ext = slab_obj_ext(slab->slab_cache, slab, obj_exts, p);
> objcg = *slab_obj_ext_objcgp(obj_ext);
> @@ -3581,6 +3584,9 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>
> slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!slab_needs_objcg(slab)))
> + continue;
> +
> if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
> alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, slab_alloc_flags)) {
> continue;
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 948d075cdbef..072cc2506756 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -622,7 +622,15 @@ static inline size_t static_obj_ext_size(void)
>
> static inline size_t slab_obj_ext_size(struct slab *slab)
> {
> - return static_obj_ext_size();
Maybe now we should rename static_obj_ext_size() to
static_obj_ext_max_size() as it reflects the max possible size of
slabobj_ext?
> + size_t sz = 0;
> +
> + if (slab_needs_objcg(slab))
> + sz += 1;
> +
> + if (slab_obj_ext_has_codetag())
> + sz += 1;
> +
> + return sizeof(struct slabobj_ext) * sz;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT
> @@ -741,7 +749,7 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup **slab_obj_ext_objcgp(struct slabobj_ext *obj_ex
> static inline union codetag_ref *
> slab_obj_ext_codetag_ref(struct slab *slab, struct slabobj_ext *obj_ext)
> {
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG))
> + if (slab_needs_objcg(slab))
> obj_ext += 1;
>
> return &obj_ext->_ctref;
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 771d73abacb6..09c4931e5435 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2503,6 +2503,9 @@ void memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void **p,
> if (likely(!obj_exts))
> return;
>
> + if (!slab_needs_objcg(slab))
> + return;
> +
> get_slab_obj_exts(obj_exts);
> __memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, objects, obj_exts);
> put_slab_obj_exts(obj_exts);
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 10:10 [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/slab, alloc_tag: reduce obj_ext memory waste Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] mm/slab: skip kfence objects in allocation profiling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 16:02 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-16 9:11 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 15:24 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] mm/slab: remove objs_per_slab() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 16:13 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] mm: move struct slabobj_ext to mm/slab.h Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 0:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] mm/slab: make slab_obj_ext() determine object index Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 1:02 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] mm/slab: abstract slabobj_ext.objcg access Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 1:27 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-16 13:58 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 15:27 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-17 10:00 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] mm/slab: abstract slabobj_ext.ref access Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 1:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] mm/slab: replace slab.stride with obj_exts_in_object Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 1:44 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] mm/slab: change struct slabobj_ext to a union Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 4:11 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-16 14:43 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 15:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] mm/slab: introduce slab_obj_ext_has_codetag() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 4:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-16 14:47 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] mm/slab: reduce slabobj_ext memory with allocation profiling disabled Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 4:30 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] mm/slab: add slab_needs_objcg() helper Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 4:36 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-15 10:10 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] mm/slab: stop allocating objcg pointers when unnecessary Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 4:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2026-07-16 15:08 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-16 15:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-17 7:36 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-15 15:32 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/slab, alloc_tag: reduce obj_ext memory waste Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-07-16 3:28 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-16 4:55 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpHuXu3BDf93zeBQWSW_k5wApegp44rHoZwk5Ym6xxbqEA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox