mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>,
	ntfs@lists.linux.dev,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntfs: fix u16 truncation of the update sequence array count check
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:58:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd86svfoGJdS2aG9CuZOFtsUkabngqpoSP3aP45N29LPMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020134433.1015126-1-zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:44 PM Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
>
> ntfs_check_restart_page_header() bounds the on-disk system page size by
> recomputing the update sequence array count from it:
>
>         u16 ra_ofs, usa_count, usa_ofs, usa_end = 0;
>         ...
>         usa_count = 1 + (logfile_system_page_size >> NTFS_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS);
>         if (usa_count != le16_to_cpu(rp->usa_count))
>                 return false;
>
> The right hand side is computed in u32 but stored in a u16, so the count
> wraps once the system page size reaches 0x2000000.  An image claiming any
> larger power of two passes the check by also claiming usa_count == 1.
>
> Nothing else limits the value, so ntfs_check_and_load_restart_page() goes
> on to kvzalloc() up to 2 GiB for the restart page and copy that many bytes
> a page at a time.  The size is only rejected afterwards, by the
> (size >> NTFS_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS) != usa_count test in post_read_mst_fixup().
>
> Compute the count in a u32 so the existing check rejects an over-large
> system page size instead of being defeated by the truncation.  This adds
> no new limit: the array holds one u16 per protected sector plus the update
> sequence number and must end within the first sector, which caps usa_count
> at 240 and the system page size at 64 KiB.
>
> Widen ra_ofs and usa_ofs as well, as ntfs_check_restart_area() already
> does: both are loaded from __le16 on-disk fields and every comparison is
> against a non-negative value, so no result changes.
>
> Fixes: 1e9ea7e04472 ("Revert "fs: Remove NTFS classic"")
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Applied it to #ntfs-next.
Thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20 13:44 Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-21  1:08 ` Hyunchul Lee
2026-10-21  1:16 ` liubaolin
2026-10-22 11:58 ` Namjae Jeon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKYAXd86svfoGJdS2aG9CuZOFtsUkabngqpoSP3aP45N29LPMQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®