From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:36:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtD7iytL5CSyn3qEZDjOTqvvZ1PPNeotuwgUB+=Q+ma4_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171206113821.GO31247@e110439-lin>
On 6 December 2017 at 12:38, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 06-Dec 10:39, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> On 30 November 2017 at 12:47, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> > static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>> > @@ -1564,6 +1564,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
>> >
>> > p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
>> >
>> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>>
>> p is null when there is no rt task to pick.
>> You should test this condition before calling cpufreq_update_util
>
> Mmm... for what I see, from the above function's implementation,
> _pick_next_task_rt() is always returning a valid pointer to an RT
> task.
>
> The above call does a:
>
> p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
>
> right before returning, and there is also a BUG_ON(!rt_se) in the
> previous RT tasks scanning loop.
>
> Am I missing something?
No you're right the return Null is done earlier if there is no task
>
>> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
>> > +
>> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
>> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
>
> [...]
>
>> > @@ -2317,6 +2323,9 @@ static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
>> >
>> > p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
>> >
>> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
>>
>> Is this change linked to the "- when a task is set to be RT" in the
>> commit message ?
>>
>> I can't see a situation where this is call without the previous one.
>> AFAICT, enqueue_task_rt will be called before each call to this
>> function
>
> Yeah, you right, in core.c the pattern seems to always be:
>
> if (queued)
> enqueue_task()
> if (running)
> set_curr_task()
>
> I'll remove this chunk from the next version.
>
>>
>> > +
>> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
>> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
>> > }
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> --
> #include <best/regards.h>
>
> Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 15:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-12 15:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-06 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 9:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31 9:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31 ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21 7:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
[not found] ` <68afaf84-893e-6770-b9f1-619cd2b6dc9c@evidence.eu.com>
2018-02-06 18:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKfTPtD7iytL5CSyn3qEZDjOTqvvZ1PPNeotuwgUB+=Q+ma4_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®