mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Betty Dall <betty.dall@hp.com>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, wangyijing@huawei.com,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI AER: pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() call missing required pci_dev_put()
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:59:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKocOOO2-akrBT9TZU5QdSNk-SyWEMGdNWfk5CXUgEy0rJtHpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354564850.1809.391.camel@bling.home>

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Alex Williamson
<alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:48 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 10:40 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Betty Dall <betty.dall@hp.com> wrote:
>> > > The function aer_recover_queue() makes a call to pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
>> > > That function is documented to require that the caller decrement the
>> > > reference count by calling pci_dev_put(). This patch adds the missing
>> > > call to pci_dev_put().
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Betty Dall <betty.dall@hp.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c |    1 +
>> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
>> > > index af4e31c..43caf53 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
>> > > @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ static void aer_recover_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>> > >                         continue;
>> > >                 }
>> > >                 do_recovery(pdev, entry.severity);
>> > > +               pci_dev_put(pdev);
>> >
>> > Are you sure pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() does indeed increment the
>> > reference count? I see that in the comments right above the
>> > definition.
>> >
>> > pci_dev_get() does that for sure. I see a call trace of
>> >
>> > pci_dev_get() -> get_device() -> kobj_to_dev(kobject_get(&dev->kobj)  etc.
>> >
>> > and kref_get() finally incrementing the
>> >
>> > static inline void kref_get(struct kref *kref)
>> > {
>> >         WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&kref->refcount));
>> >         atomic_inc(&kref->refcount);
>> > }
>> >
>> > However, I could not find any evidence that
>> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() does that. I see
>> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() calling pci_domain_nr() and there are
>> > several architecture specific defines for pci_domain_nr(). It is not
>> > clear to me where does refcount get incremented from
>> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() is called.
>> >
>> > What am I missing?
>>
>> Trace back the for_each_pci_dev()
>>
>> for_each_pci_dev
>>  -> pci_get_device
>>   -> pci_get_subsys
>>    -> pci_get_dev_by_id
>>     -> bus_find_device
>>      -> get_device()
>>
>> The real question is how many places do we call for_each_pci_dev()
>> without a put.  It seems like pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() doesn't even
>> get it right since it should include a put of the non-matched devices.
>
> My bad, pci_get_dev_by_id() does a put on the previous devices, keeping
> the counts in order.  Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
Thanks Alex.

Betty,

You have my

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com>

Also if you think this is applicable to stable as well, could you
please CC it for stable.

-- Shuah

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-03 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-03 16:37 Betty Dall
2012-12-03 17:40 ` Shuah Khan
2012-12-03 19:48   ` Alex Williamson
2012-12-03 20:00     ` Alex Williamson
2012-12-03 20:59       ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2013-01-07 18:46         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-03 20:01     ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKocOOO2-akrBT9TZU5QdSNk-SyWEMGdNWfk5CXUgEy0rJtHpQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=betty.dall@hp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®