From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750932AbdHRIgf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:35 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:37191 "EHLO mail-io0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbdHRIgd (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170818082616.vyk5z5s2kicc66ip@gmail.com> References: <20170814105231.14608-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170814105231.14608-6-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170818082616.vyk5z5s2kicc66ip@gmail.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:36:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arnd Bergmann , Heiko Carstens , Kees Cook , Will Deacon , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Garnier , Thomas Gleixner , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Catalin Marinas , Petr Mladek , Ingo Molnar , James Morris , Andrew Morton , Nicolas Pitre , Steven Rostedt , Martin Schwidefsky , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jessica Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18 August 2017 at 09:26, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> -static void for_each_tracepoint_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin, >> - struct tracepoint * const *end, >> +static void for_each_tracepoint_range(const void *begin, const void *end, >> void (*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv), >> void *priv) >> { >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS >> + const signed int *iter; >> + >> + if (!begin) >> + return; >> + for (iter = begin; iter < (signed int *)end; iter++) { >> + fct((struct tracepoint *)((unsigned long)iter + *iter), priv); >> + } > > I think checkpatch is correct here to complain about the unnecessary curly braces > here. > Fair enough. I will clean up to the extent feasible. > Plus why the heavy use of 'signed int' here and elsewhere in the patches - why > not 'int' ? > Yes, just 'int' should be sufficient. Force of habit, I suppose, given that unqualified 'char' is ambiguous between architectures, but this does not apply to 'int' of course. > Plus #2, the heavy use of type casts looks pretty ugly to begin with - is there no > way to turn this into more natural code? > Actually, Steven requested to keep the tracepoint section markers as they are, and cast them to (int *) in the conditionally compiled PREL32 case. So I guess it is a matter of taste, but because the types are fundamentally incompatible when this code is in effect (and the size of the pointed-to type differs on 64-bit architectures), there is always some mangling required. The initcall patch is probably the cleanest in this regard, but involves typedefs, which are frowned upon as well.