From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382CC433F5 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD6208B8 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ep3bWn24" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7AD6208B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727611AbeH0W5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:57:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55210 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727029AbeH0W5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:57:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86EB8208B8 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1535396951; bh=T86lLfOBUG4HX/q1zp6rT3trOXWgjJkCxfl8/mOafGg=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=Ep3bWn24DhCBALZNCp3IBdC7YNV8UrJUeE96ReEDnvPgNXB+oCH7M7A4yXMh/+pvT ygaV/ugW9uOAZyKgdxKYccVTXk/uPFlARUrEXrQSRAknTO+efdMcvmK3ZfW+7YFidZ dxRMofE5tj6ptBdIJYj+N+YdekgkIs6+mHvW4FyQ= Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a108-v6so2233wrc.13 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:09:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BO3EWxmyAsCIhOIirKBr6Z0WBgwXQB9do1DfGGHlprfiKaenMm nUBhItjwSVxEY/0aeWPElEMlVNu1qh0AwFKa+VrAlw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYr46jAuDFWhnHiGGCgOv/cTi8jGvMwwr6gaYpgz8Ev5EvWFMNeqE3BbJSOju9rm4PKa/mIpKPtzVektj/iKg8= X-Received: by 2002:adf:c554:: with SMTP id s20-v6mr9344038wrf.46.1535396950074; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:09:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a1c:548:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:08:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180827185631.163506-6-jannh@google.com> References: <20180827185631.163506-1-jannh@google.com> <20180827185631.163506-6-jannh@google.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:08:49 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] x86: plumb error code and fault address through to fault handlers To: Jann Horn Cc: Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Andy Lutomirski , Kernel Hardening , Tony Luck , Borislav Petkov , LKML , Dmitry Vyukov , linux-edac Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Jann Horn wrote: > This is preparation for looking at trap number and fault address in the > handlers for uaccess errors. > This patch should not change any behavior. Confused. $SUBJECT says you're plumbing the error code through, and you are sort of doing it: > -int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) > +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr, unsigned long error_code, > + unsigned long fault_addr) > { It's available here... > const struct exception_table_entry *e; > ex_handler_t handler; > @@ -202,7 +212,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) > return 0; > > handler = ex_fixup_handler(e); > - return handler(e, regs, trapnr); > + return handler(e, regs, trapnr, fault_addr); ... but you don't pass it into the handlers. Is this intentional?