From: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
To: Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"xmei5@asu.edu" <xmei5@asu.edu>, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on empty publication list
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 02:34:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANgPUi1QTDP5Xo9LanuBEgzDREcxbAc6KE4Ltccoz_O6DF0=3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GV1P189MB1988F91A48BC981B816C2700C6C62@GV1P189MB1988.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech> 于2026年7月17日周五 17:48写道:
>
> >Subject: [PATCH net v4 2/2] tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on
> >empty publication list
> >
> >named_distribute() ends by stamping the last_bulk flag on the tail skb via
> >buf_msg(skb_peek_tail(list)). When the publication list is empty no skb is
> >enqueued, skb_peek_tail() returns NULL, and buf_msg(NULL) is dereferenced.
> >
> >tipc_named_node_up() runs this on &nt->cluster_scope. With a node-id
> >configuration cluster_scope is populated only later by tipc_net_finalize(), so a
> >peer link that comes up first reaches named_distribute() with an empty list. It
> >is reachable by an unprivileged user (TIPC genl ops use
> >GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM) over a UDP bearer in a user+net namespace:
> >
> > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000d8-0x00000000000000df]
> > RIP: 0010:tipc_named_node_up (net/tipc/name_distr.c:196)
> > tipc_named_node_up (net/tipc/name_distr.c:196 net/tipc/name_distr.c:221)
> > tipc_node_write_unlock (net/tipc/node.c:428)
> > tipc_rcv (net/tipc/node.c:2185)
> > tipc_udp_recv (net/tipc/udp_media.c:392) Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal
> >exception in interrupt
> >
> >The peer holds back this node's later name updates until it sees a bulk with the
> >last_bulk flag, so simply skipping the send would stall it. Emit an item-less bulk
> >when the publication list is empty, so the peer still receives the last_bulk flag
> >and opens.
> >
> >Fixes: cad2929dc432 ("tipc: update a binding service via broadcast")
> >Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
> >Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> >Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> >---
> > net/tipc/name_distr.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/tipc/name_distr.c b/net/tipc/name_distr.c index
> >ba4f4906e13b..a8bb7bd101ea 100644
> >--- a/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> >+++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> >@@ -192,6 +192,20 @@ static void named_distribute(struct net *net, struct
> >sk_buff_head *list,
> > skb_trim(skb, INT_H_SIZE + (msg_dsz - msg_rem));
> > __skb_queue_tail(list, skb);
> > }
> >+
> >+ if (skb_queue_empty(list)) {
> >+ skb = named_prepare_buf(net, PUBLICATION, 0, dnode);
> >+ if (!skb) {
> >+ pr_warn("Bulk publication failure\n");
> >+ return;
> >+ }
> >+ hdr = buf_msg(skb);
> >+ msg_set_bc_ack_invalid(hdr, true);
> >+ msg_set_bulk(hdr);
> >+ msg_set_non_legacy(hdr);
> >+ __skb_queue_tail(list, skb);
> >+ }
> As I explained before, this approach is wrong because
> 1. It does not handle memory allocation failure.
> 2. It breaks receiving peer by sending non-data message to that peer in case skb is not NULL.
>
> Could you please test below patch to see if it fixes the NULL dereference issue you reported ?
Hi ,
Tested your patch, it fixes the NULL dereference I reported. No more
panic with an empty cluster_scope .
One new bug found during testing: if tipc_nametbl_publish() fails in
tipc_net_finalize(), the node is
still marked finalized, so the deferred worker wakes up and calls
named_distribute() with an empty list,
hitting the same NULL dereference.
I have the fix ready and sent it out:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260717183047.2725959-1-bestswngs@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260717183047.2725959-2-bestswngs@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260717183047.2725959-3-bestswngs@gmail.com/
Thanks,
Weiming Shi
>
> ---
> net/tipc/core.c | 1 +
> net/tipc/core.h | 2 ++
> net/tipc/name_distr.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> net/tipc/name_distr.h | 3 ++-
> net/tipc/net.c | 2 ++
> net/tipc/node.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 6 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/core.c b/net/tipc/core.c
> index 315975c3be81..9e81be4f01cf 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/core.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/core.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int __net_init tipc_init_net(struct net *net)
> tn->trial_addr = 0;
> tn->addr_trial_end = 0;
> tn->capabilities = TIPC_NODE_CAPABILITIES;
> + atomic_set(&tn->finalized, 0);
> INIT_WORK(&tn->work, tipc_net_finalize_work);
> memset(tn->node_id, 0, sizeof(tn->node_id));
> memset(tn->node_id_string, 0, sizeof(tn->node_id_string));
> diff --git a/net/tipc/core.h b/net/tipc/core.h
> index 9ce5f9ff6cc0..76768844c808 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/core.h
> +++ b/net/tipc/core.h
> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ struct tipc_net {
> struct work_struct work;
> /* The numbers of work queues in schedule */
> atomic_t wq_count;
> + /* flag to indicate work has finished */
> + atomic_t finalized;
> };
>
> static inline struct tipc_net *tipc_net(struct net *net)
> diff --git a/net/tipc/name_distr.c b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> index ba5f4906e13b..8a1692dbd243 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tipc_named_withdraw(struct net *net, struct publication *p)
> * @pls: linked list of publication items to be packed into buffer chain
> * @seqno: sequence number for this message
> */
> -static void named_distribute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> +static int named_distribute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> u32 dnode, struct list_head *pls, u16 seqno)
> {
> struct publication *publ;
> @@ -164,8 +164,9 @@ static void named_distribute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> skb = named_prepare_buf(net, PUBLICATION, msg_rem,
> dnode);
> if (!skb) {
> + __skb_queue_purge(list);
> pr_warn("Bulk publication failure\n");
> - return;
> + return 1;
> }
> hdr = buf_msg(skb);
> msg_set_bc_ack_invalid(hdr, true);
> @@ -195,6 +196,8 @@ static void named_distribute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> hdr = buf_msg(skb_peek_tail(list));
> msg_set_last_bulk(hdr);
> msg_set_named_seqno(hdr, seqno);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -203,7 +206,7 @@ static void named_distribute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> * @dnode: destination node
> * @capabilities: peer node's capabilities
> */
> -void tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities)
> +int tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities)
> {
> struct name_table *nt = tipc_name_table(net);
> struct tipc_net *tn = tipc_net(net);
> @@ -218,9 +221,46 @@ void tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities)
> spin_unlock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>
> read_lock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> - named_distribute(net, &head, dnode, &nt->cluster_scope, seqno);
> + /* tipc_net_finalize_work() has not finished inserting self address to
> + * name table yet.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(list_empty(&nt->cluster_scope))) {
> + read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (named_distribute(net, &head, dnode, &nt->cluster_scope, seqno)) {
> + read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + return -ENOBUFS;
> + }
> +
> tipc_node_xmit(net, &head, dnode, 0);
> read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int tipc_named_dist_cluster_scope(struct net *net, u32 dnode)
> +{
> + struct name_table *nt = tipc_name_table(net);
> + struct tipc_net *tn = tipc_net(net);
> + struct sk_buff_head head;
> + u16 seqno;
> +
> + __skb_queue_head_init(&head);
> + wait_var_event(&tn->finalized, atomic_read(&tn->finalized));
> + spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
> + seqno = nt->snd_nxt;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
> +
> + read_lock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + if (named_distribute(net, &head, dnode, &nt->cluster_scope, seqno)) {
> + read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + return -ENOBUFS;
> + }
> + tipc_node_xmit(net, &head, dnode, 0);
> + read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/net/tipc/name_distr.h b/net/tipc/name_distr.h
> index c677f6f082df..cadf4e8c3e66 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/name_distr.h
> +++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ struct distr_item {
>
> struct sk_buff *tipc_named_publish(struct net *net, struct publication *publ);
> struct sk_buff *tipc_named_withdraw(struct net *net, struct publication *publ);
> -void tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities);
> +int tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities);
> +int tipc_named_dist_cluster_scope(struct net *net, u32 dnode);
> void tipc_named_rcv(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *namedq,
> u16 *rcv_nxt, bool *open);
> void tipc_named_reinit(struct net *net);
> diff --git a/net/tipc/net.c b/net/tipc/net.c
> index 7e65d0b0c4a8..4c144e720ac1 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/net.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/net.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ static void tipc_net_finalize(struct net *net, u32 addr)
> tipc_sk_reinit(net);
> tipc_mon_reinit_self(net);
> tipc_nametbl_publish(net, &ua, &sk, addr);
> + atomic_inc(&tn->finalized);
> + wake_up_var(&tn->finalized);
> }
>
> void tipc_net_finalize_work(struct work_struct *work)
> diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c
> index 8e4ef2630ae4..c5b0a98324c3 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/node.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/node.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ struct tipc_node {
> #ifdef CONFIG_TIPC_CRYPTO
> struct tipc_crypto *crypto_rx;
> #endif
> + /* Work item for bulk distribution of cluster scope publications */
> + struct work_struct work;
> };
>
> /* Node FSM states and events:
> @@ -303,6 +305,7 @@ static void tipc_node_free(struct rcu_head *rp)
> #ifdef CONFIG_TIPC_CRYPTO
> tipc_crypto_stop(&n->crypto_rx);
> #endif
> + cancel_work_sync(&n->work);
> kfree(n);
> }
>
> @@ -393,6 +396,19 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock_fast(struct tipc_node *n)
> write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
> }
>
> +static void tipc_node_dist_bulk(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct tipc_node *node = container_of(work, struct tipc_node, work);
> +
> + if (tipc_named_dist_cluster_scope(node->net, node->addr) < 0) {
> + u32 bearer_id = node->link_id & 0xffff;
> +
> + tipc_node_link_down(node, bearer_id, false);
> + }
> +
> + tipc_node_put(node);
> +}
> +
> static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struct tipc_node *n)
> __releases(n->lock)
> {
> @@ -424,8 +440,21 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struct tipc_node *n)
> if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_DOWN)
> tipc_publ_notify(net, publ_list, node, n->capabilities);
>
> - if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP)
> - tipc_named_node_up(net, node, n->capabilities);
> + if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP) {
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + rc = tipc_named_node_up(net, node, n->capabilities);
> + /* Defer bulk distribution to work queue */
> + if (rc > 0) {
> + tipc_node_get(n);
> + schedule_work(&n->work);
> + } else if (rc < 0) {
> + /* Bring the link down to start over bulk distribution
> + * when the link is up again.
> + */
> + tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id, false);
> + }
> + }
>
> if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_UP) {
> tipc_mon_peer_up(net, node, bearer_id);
> @@ -564,6 +593,7 @@ struct tipc_node *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr, u8 *peer_id,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->publ_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->conn_sks);
> + INIT_WORK(&n->work, tipc_node_dist_bulk);
> skb_queue_head_init(&n->bc_entry.namedq);
> skb_queue_head_init(&n->bc_entry.inputq1);
> __skb_queue_head_init(&n->bc_entry.arrvq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 19:02 [PATCH net v4 0/2] " Weiming Shi
2026-07-16 19:02 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] tipc: guard against empty list in tipc_node_xmit() Weiming Shi
2026-07-16 19:02 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on empty publication list Weiming Shi
2026-07-17 9:48 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2026-07-17 18:34 ` Weiming Shi [this message]
2026-07-17 19:00 ` Weiming Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANgPUi1QTDP5Xo9LanuBEgzDREcxbAc6KE4Ltccoz_O6DF0=3Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox