mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tcp/dcpp: Un-pin tw_timer
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:40:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+pQ3j+rb2SjFWjCU7BEges3TADDes5+csEr1JJamtzPQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231016125934.1970789-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:00 PM Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The TCP timewait timer is proving to be problematic for setups where scheduler
> CPU isolation is achieved at runtime via cpusets (as opposed to statically via
> isolcpus=domains).
>
> What happens there is a CPU goes through tcp_time_wait(), arming the time_wait
> timer, then gets isolated. TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN later, the timer fires, causing
> interference for the now-isolated CPU. This is conceptually similar to the issue
> described in
>   e02b93124855 ("workqueue: Unbind kworkers before sending them to exit()")
>
> Making the timer un-pinned would resolve this, as it would be queued onto
> HK_FLAG_TIMER CPUs. It would Unfortunately go against
>   ed2e92394589 ("tcp/dccp: fix timewait races in timer handling")
> as we'd need to arm the timer after the *hashdance() to not have it fire before
> we've finished setting up the timewait_socket.
>
> However, looking into this, I cannot grok what race is fixed by having the timer
> *armed* before the hashdance.

That was because :

1) the timer could expire before we had a chance to set refcnt to
a non zero value. I guess this is fine if we use an extra atomic decrement.

OR

2) another cpu could find the TW and delete it (trying to cancel the
tw_timer) before
   we could arm the timer.  ( inet_twsk_deschedule_put() is using
del_timer_sync() followed by inet_twsk_kill())

Thus the tw timer would be armed for 60 seconds, then we would have to
wait for the timer to really
get rid of the tw structure.

I think you also need to change inet_twsk_deschedule_put() logic ?

>
> [this next segment is brought to you by Cunningham's Law]
>

I guess this is not really relevant to the potential issue.

> Using [1] as an example, inet_twsk_schedule() only arms the timer and increments
> the deathrow refcount, which by itself does not affect
> __inet_lookup_established(). AFAICT it only comes in handy if:
> 1) A CPU ends up livelocking in __inet_lookup_established() (cf. [1], though per
>    inet_twsk_alloc() I don't see how a timewait socket can hit the
>    forever-looping conditions with how the sk_hash and addr/port pairs are copied)
> 2) the initialization context can be interrupted by NET_RX (it can, cf.
>    cfac7f836a71 ("tcp/dccp: block bh before arming time_wait timer"))
>
> In this scenario, we need the timer to fire to go through
>   inet_twsk_kill()
>     sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu()
> and break out of the loop.
>
> Keep softirqs disabled, but make the timer un-pinned and arm it after the
> hashdance. Remote CPUs may start using the timewait socket before the timer is
> armed, but their execution of __inet_lookup_established() won't prevent the
> arming of the timer.

OK, I guess we can live with the following race :

CPU0

   allocates a tw, insert it in hash table

CPU1:                               finds the TW and removes it (timer
cancel does nothing)

CPU0
   arms a TW timer, lasting

>
> This partially reverts
>   ed2e92394589 ("tcp/dccp: fix timewait races in timer handling")
> and
>   ec94c2696f0b ("tcp/dccp: avoid one atomic operation for timewait hashdance")
>
> Link: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56941035.9040000@fastly.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZPhpfMjSiHVjQkTk@localhost.localdomain/
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> ---
>  net/dccp/minisocks.c          | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c |  9 ++++-----
>  net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c      | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dccp/minisocks.c b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> index 64d805b27adde..188a29a1aef49 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> @@ -53,16 +53,18 @@ void dccp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
>                 if (state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT)
>                         timeo = DCCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
>
> -               /* tw_timer is pinned, so we need to make sure BH are disabled
> -                * in following section, otherwise timer handler could run before
> -                * we complete the initialization.
> -                */
> -               local_bh_disable();
> -               inet_twsk_schedule(tw, timeo);
> -               /* Linkage updates.
> -                * Note that access to tw after this point is illegal.
> +               /* tw_timer is armed after the hashdance and recount update, so
> +                * we need to make sure BH are disabled in following section to
> +                * ensure the timer is armed before we handle any further skb's.
>                  */
> +              local_bh_disable();
> +
> +               // Linkage updates
>                 inet_twsk_hashdance(tw, sk, &dccp_hashinfo);
> +               inet_twsk_schedule(tw, timeo);
> +               // Access to tw after this point is illegal.
> +               inet_twsk_put(tw);
> +
>                 local_bh_enable();
>         } else {
>                 /* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
> index dd37a5bf68811..ba59c2c6ef4a2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
> @@ -152,16 +152,15 @@ void inet_twsk_hashdance(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sock *sk,
>
>         spin_unlock(lock);
>
> -       /* tw_refcnt is set to 3 because we have :
> +       /* tw_refcnt is set to 4 because we have :
>          * - one reference for bhash chain.
>          * - one reference for ehash chain.
>          * - one reference for timer.
> +        * - One reference for ourself (our caller will release it).
>          * We can use atomic_set() because prior spin_lock()/spin_unlock()
>          * committed into memory all tw fields.
> -        * Also note that after this point, we lost our implicit reference
> -        * so we are not allowed to use tw anymore.
>          */
> -       refcount_set(&tw->tw_refcnt, 3);
> +       refcount_set(&tw->tw_refcnt, 4);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_twsk_hashdance);
>
> @@ -207,7 +206,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock *inet_twsk_alloc(const struct sock *sk,
>                 tw->tw_prot         = sk->sk_prot_creator;
>                 atomic64_set(&tw->tw_cookie, atomic64_read(&sk->sk_cookie));
>                 twsk_net_set(tw, sock_net(sk));
> -               timer_setup(&tw->tw_timer, tw_timer_handler, TIMER_PINNED);
> +               timer_setup(&tw->tw_timer, tw_timer_handler, 0);
>                 /*
>                  * Because we use RCU lookups, we should not set tw_refcnt
>                  * to a non null value before everything is setup for this
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> index b98d476f1594b..269d4aa14a49e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> @@ -324,16 +324,18 @@ void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
>                 if (state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
>                         timeo = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
>
> -               /* tw_timer is pinned, so we need to make sure BH are disabled
> -                * in following section, otherwise timer handler could run before
> -                * we complete the initialization.
> -                */
> -               local_bh_disable();
> -               inet_twsk_schedule(tw, timeo);
> -               /* Linkage updates.
> -                * Note that access to tw after this point is illegal.
> +               /* tw_timer is armed after the hashdance and recount update, so
> +                * we need to make sure BH are disabled in following section to
> +                * ensure the timer is armed before we handle any further skb's.
>                  */
> +              local_bh_disable();
> +
> +               // Linkage updates.
>                 inet_twsk_hashdance(tw, sk, net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo);
> +               inet_twsk_schedule(tw, timeo);
> +               // Access to tw after this point is illegal.
> +               inet_twsk_put(tw);
> +
>                 local_bh_enable();
>         } else {
>                 /* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this
> --
> 2.39.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-16 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-16 12:59 Valentin Schneider
2023-10-16 15:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2023-10-18 14:57   ` Valentin Schneider
2023-10-18 15:00     ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-18 15:27       ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANn89i+pQ3j+rb2SjFWjCU7BEges3TADDes5+csEr1JJamtzPQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®