From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933109Ab3EOUvX (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 16:51:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:64648 "EHLO mail-ob0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932698Ab3EOUvV (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 16:51:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130515035714.GB17398@xanatos> References: <1368160971-2176-1-git-send-email-jwerner@chromium.org> <20130515035714.GB17398@xanatos> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:51:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DYlisuWq4h0BHqRciGDr3mfA8lE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Consolidate XHCI TD Size calculation From: Julius Werner To: Sarah Sharp Cc: Julius Werner , LKML , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Palatin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Does this patch fix the control transfer data stage issue? Please break > this into a bug fix for that, with your refactoring on top of that. We > need to backport the bug fix to the stable kernels, and queue the > refactoring for 3.11. I don't think there is really any practial adverse effect from the wrong TD length in control transfers, since it has been there forever and not caused any problems. I don't think it's worth a backport to older kernels, I'd just like it fixed (and cleaner) for readability's sake moving forward.