From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Paweł Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"tgih.jun@samsung.com" <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
"Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
"Chris Ball" <chris@printf.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@altera.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Sonny Rao" <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
"Alexandru Stan" <amstan@chromium.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"zhenfu.fang" <zhenfu.fang@rock-chips.com>,
"Eddie Cai" <cf@rock-chips.com>, lintao <lintao@rock-chips.com>,
chenfen <chenfen@rock-chips.com>, zyf <zyf@rock-chips.com>,
"Jianqun Xu" <xjq@rock-chips.com>,
"Tao Huang" <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
"Chris Zhong" <zyw@rock-chips.com>, 姚智情 <yzq@rock-chips.com>,
"Han Jiang" <hj@rock-chips.com>,
"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
zhangqing <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
"Lin Huang" <hl@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: use card pointer as the first parameter of execute_tuning()
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp=5epMggHu0+u_LU7ETujcoeP2xOpB7iD6JF2bs8BnEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422271175-19445-2-git-send-email-addy.ke@rock-chips.com>
On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
mmc_send_status() is an mmc core function, not intended for host's to call.
> but mmc->card is NULL in tuning state. So we need change the first parameter
> of execute_tuning() to card pointer(struct mmc_card * card).
So, why do we need this?
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 1be7055..271f024 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ int mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_card *card)
> opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
>
> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
> - err = host->ops->execute_tuning(host, opcode);
> + err = host->ops->execute_tuning(card, opcode);
> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>
> if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 4bd22af..e54e656 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1485,8 +1485,9 @@ free_blk_test:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> +static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_card *card, u32 opcode)
> {
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = card->host;
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data = host->drv_data;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> index 1d3d6c4..230bd2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> @@ -1270,8 +1270,9 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> +static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_card *card, u32 opcode)
> {
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = card->host;
> struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct rtsx_pcr *pcr = host->pcr;
> int err = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
> index 88af827..c494c06 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
> @@ -1265,8 +1265,9 @@ out:
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> +static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_card *card, u32 opcode)
> {
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = card->host;
> struct rtsx_usb_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct rtsx_ucr *ucr = host->ucr;
> int err = 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 0c8cbe5..ec4128e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
> int (*card_busy)(struct mmc_host *host);
>
> /* The tuning command opcode value is different for SD and eMMC cards */
> - int (*execute_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, u32 opcode);
> + int (*execute_tuning)(struct mmc_card *card, u32 opcode);
>
> /* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
> int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 11:19 [PATCH 0/2] fix bug that cause tuning failure Addy Ke
2015-01-26 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: use card pointer as the first parameter of execute_tuning() Addy Ke
2015-01-26 15:15 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2015-01-26 17:45 ` Doug Anderson
2015-01-26 17:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-27 15:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-29 0:55 ` Doug Anderson
2015-01-26 11:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: wait until card ready if tuning fails Addy Ke
2015-01-29 8:45 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPDyKFp=5epMggHu0+u_LU7ETujcoeP2xOpB7iD6JF2bs8BnEA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=addy.ke@rock-chips.com \
--cc=amstan@chromium.org \
--cc=cf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=chenfen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hj@rock-chips.com \
--cc=hl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=lintao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=xjq@rock-chips.com \
--cc=yzq@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhenfu.fang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zyf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zyw@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®