mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
To: arnd@kernel.org
Cc: arighi@nvidia.com, arnd@arndb.de, boqun@kernel.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	kunwu.chan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, qiang.zhang@linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	urezki@gmail.com, yphbchou0911@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: include rtmutex_common.h in tree_stall.h
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 21:03:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CCDC929F-9556-4F8E-8B98-073F931F254B@mainlining.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925133922.1356404-1-arnd@kernel.org>

On 25 September 2026 14:39:04 BST, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
>The added call to rt_mutex_owner() makes this fail to build in
>some configurations:
>
>In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:5121:
>kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:333:8: error: call to undeclared function
>'rt_mutex_owner'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function
>declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>  333 |                         if (rt_mutex_owner(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex) == t)
>      |                             ^
>kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:333:48: error: comparison between pointer and
>integer ('int' and 'struct task_struct *')
>[-Werror,-Wpointer-integer-compare]
>  333 |                         if (rt_mutex_owner(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex) == t)
>      |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~
>In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:5124:
>In file included from kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:14:
>kernel/rcu/../locking/rtmutex_common.h:231:35: error: conflicting types
>for 'rt_mutex_owner'
>  231 | static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
>      |                                   ^
>kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:333:8: note: previous implicit declaration is here
>  333 |                         if (rt_mutex_owner(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex) == t)
>      |                             ^
>
>There are already a couple of inclusions of "../locking/rtmutex_common.h",
>so assume this is safe to do here.
>
>Fixes: 1eccf02fb8d5 ("rcu: Add running and boosted indications to RCU task stall dump")
>Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Looks "ok" 

Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>

Perhaps Paul could suggest another alternative M

>---
>I wonder if it would be better to either move the rt_mutex_owner()
>definition into a global header like include/linux/rtmutex.h, or to
>move the code out of tree_stall.h into a .c file, as this feels like a
>layering violation.
>---
> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
>index 5dded1e89197..803a56af3259 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
>@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/rcu_notifier.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
>+#include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
> 
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> //
>

--- Thanks!
"I'm not a very positive person" - Linus torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-27 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25 13:39 Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-27 20:03 ` Bradley Morgan [this message]
2026-09-28  2:54 ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-29 21:08   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-30 18:36     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-30 20:07       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-29 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-30  7:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-30 17:58     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CCDC929F-9556-4F8E-8B98-073F931F254B@mainlining.org \
    --to=brads@mainlining.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®