mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: LAPIC: Don't need to clear IPI delivery status in x2apic mode
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:40:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE34AD16-64A7-4AA0-9928-507C6F3FF6CD@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+CzB3dWatF7qOO_WajXM_ZBn1U6Z8+uq4NxCuLG3TgwY1Q@mail.gmail.com>

> On Mar 31, 2020, at 11:46 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Cc more people,
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:35, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 01/04/20 02:19, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> -             /* No delay here, so we always clear the pending bit */
>>> -             val &= ~(1 << 12);
>>> +             /* Immediately clear Delivery Status in xAPIC mode */
>>> +             if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
>>> +                     val &= ~(1 << 12);
>> 
>> This adds a conditional, and the old behavior was valid according to the
>> SDM: "software should not assume the value returned by reading the ICR
>> is the last written value".
> 
> Nadav, Sean, what do you think?

I do not know. But if you write a KVM unit-test, I can run it on bare-metal
and give you feedback about how it behaves.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-01 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-01  0:19 [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: X86: Filter out the broadcast dest for IPI fastpath Wanpeng Li
2020-04-01  0:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: LAPIC: Don't need to clear IPI delivery status in x2apic mode Wanpeng Li
2020-04-01  0:35   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-01  6:46     ` Wanpeng Li
2020-04-01 17:40       ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2020-04-01 23:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02  0:14           ` Wanpeng Li
2020-04-01 10:17     ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CE34AD16-64A7-4AA0-9928-507C6F3FF6CD@vmware.com \
    --to=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome