mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Joseph" <Joseph.Liu@Emulex.Com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Zhang, LongX" <longx.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "linasvepstas@gmail.com" <linasvepstas@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: Subject : [ PATCH ] pci-reset-error_state-to-pci_channel_io_normal-at-report_slot_reset
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:41:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CF6E51640088844D9CADE5541A7C2FEB33EBE413@CMEXMB1.ad.emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130520224824.GA31740@google.com>

Bjorn,

>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> index ed4d094..7abefd9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>> @@ -332,13 +332,11 @@ static pci_ers_result_t pcie_portdrv_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  	pci_ers_result_t status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>>  	int retval;
>>  
>> -	/* If fatal, restore cfg space for possible link reset at upstream */
>> -	if (dev->error_state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
>> -		dev->state_saved = true;
>> -		pci_restore_state(dev);
>> -		pcie_portdrv_restore_config(dev);
>> -		pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(dev);
>> -	}
>> +	/* restore cfg space for possible link reset at upstream */
>> +	dev->state_saved = true;
>> +	pci_restore_state(dev);
>> +	pcie_portdrv_restore_config(dev);
>> +	pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(dev);
>>  
>>  	/* get true return value from &status */
>>  	retval = device_for_each_child(&dev->dev, &status, slot_reset_iter);
>
>I think this patch changes the behavior in the case of a non-fatal error
>where one of the .error_detected() methods returned
>PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET.  In that case, pcie_portdrv_slot_reset()
>previously did not restore config space, but after your patch, it *will*
>restore it.  We need an explanation of why this is safe. 

Here is my understanding of this part of the patch:

I think your concern here should not be an issue. Whether it is a non-fatal error or a fatal error, as long as one of the .error_detected() method from the downstream drivers involved returns a PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET, it should trump all others and a slot reset should be performed, even though it was originally due to a non-fatal error reported or only one of the downstream drivers requests it. In the case of AER driver, this should be implemented in the broadcast_error_message() with pci_walk_bus() by passing in the report_error_detected() function, and merging the results into the result_data->result...

In any case, the fact that this pcie_portdrv_slot_reset() being invoked should be considered as a aftermath of a slot reset has been performed, thus the restore of config space should be performed after the reset. I suppose the restore should be to the same state as fresh power-on states, right?

Thanks,
Joe Liu, Ph.D.
Senior Principal Engineer
Emulex Corporation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-21 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-26  6:28 Zhang, LongX
2013-05-02  0:30 ` Yanmin Zhang
     [not found]   ` <CAHrUA34H_B-ffebx6ueHgV1ax-PL_3hLZr1JGaP2NJZ7bYgvtw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-03  0:33     ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-05-03  2:00       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-03  3:13         ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-05-03 18:00           ` Linas Vepstas
2013-05-07  6:01             ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-05-17 23:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-17 23:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-20 17:21     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-20 17:52       ` Linas Vepstas
2013-05-20 14:38   ` Liu, Joseph
2013-05-20 15:37     ` Linas Vepstas
2013-05-21  7:49       ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-05-21 13:38         ` Linas Vepstas
2013-05-20 22:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-21  7:40   ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-05-21 16:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-21 15:41   ` Liu, Joseph [this message]
2013-05-21 16:26     ` Linas Vepstas
2013-05-21 16:51     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-04 18:04       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-05  0:38         ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-06-05 13:30           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-06  6:29             ` Yanmin Zhang
2013-06-10 17:24               ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CF6E51640088844D9CADE5541A7C2FEB33EBE413@CMEXMB1.ad.emulex.com \
    --to=joseph.liu@emulex.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longx.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®