From: "Pawandeep Oza (QUIC)" <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
To: 'Will Deacon' <will@kernel.org>,
"Pawandeep Oza (QUIC)" <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
Cc: "sudeep.holla@arm.com" <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:13:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH0PR02MB8073FDF02E252CDC265570FFF6F7A@CH0PR02MB8073.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914132149.GA13461@willie-the-truck>
-----Original Message-----
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 6:22 AM
To: Pawandeep Oza (QUIC) <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; rafael@kernel.org; lenb@kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:29:33AM -0700, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> Arm(r) Functional Fixed Hardware Specification defines LPI states, which
> provide an architectural context loss flags field that can be used to
> describe the context that might be lost when an LPI state is entered.
>
> - Core context Lost
> - General purpose registers.
> - Floating point and SIMD registers.
> - System registers, include the System register based
> - generic timer for the core.
> - Debug register in the core power domain.
> - PMU registers in the core power domain.
> - Trace register in the core power domain.
> - Trace context loss
> - GICR
> - GICD
>
> Qualcomm's custom CPUs preserves the architectural state, including
> keeping the power domain for local timers active.
> when core is power gated, the local timers are sufficient to wake the
> core up without needing broadcast timer.
>
> The patch fixes the evaluation of cpuidle arch_flags, and moves only
> to broadcast timer if core context lost is defined in ACPI LPI.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h index 4d537d56eb84..a30b6e16628d
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_ACPI_H
> #define _ASM_ACPI_H
>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> #include <linux/efi.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/psci.h>
> @@ -44,6 +45,25 @@
>
> #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_TRBE (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
> trbe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
> +/*
> + * Arm(r) Functional Fixed Hardware Specification Version 1.2.
> + * Table 2: Arm Architecture context loss flags */
> +#define CPUIDLE_CORE_CTXT BIT(0) /* Core context Lost */
> +
> +#ifndef arch_update_idle_state_flags
> +static __always_inline void _arch_update_idle_state_flags(u32 arch_flags,
> + unsigned int *sflags)
> +{
> + if (arch_flags & CPUIDLE_CORE_CTXT)
> + *sflags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP; } #define
> +arch_update_idle_state_flags _arch_update_idle_state_flags #endif
Why do you need the #ifndef/endif guards here? I'd have thought you'd _always_ want this definition to be the one used, with the compiler complaining otherwise.
Oza: thanks, Will!, will remove it.
Will
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 17:29 Oza Pawandeep
2023-09-13 8:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-13 10:27 ` Will Deacon
2023-09-13 10:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-14 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2023-09-14 18:13 ` Pawandeep Oza (QUIC) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CH0PR02MB8073FDF02E252CDC265570FFF6F7A@CH0PR02MB8073.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
--to=quic_poza@quicinc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®