From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E5C13174B; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711039830; cv=none; b=JfkTaaUQQUQsjiN9WiZg+o8ljTV7g6L+ayIeEJPshFYrkV7ZBS8hJpZuGnqZ9Cfd2xjvpS4niNO11q1ERp9+cAYdd0FLR1mbp+0+7SWmD1xcipR3LJSUbsn4ia4+wJNgHHQdWR5tlvtOJTteKEPQ8nzRYq9RM7atS2EhKm6cbjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711039830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tNuHZJKyhybA+h0H/rFDTN4oQHxgp+RHik+5RM1pSFA=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=eOwD0UKsR2/Ks9WwRfXvSQ/M+G7evE6nRRQndVqpOOBbsXEwNs1jz2V9wU4prcbOiTYaugqv4Sho07MglobRo+mrBQ626FvSWDhfbMbeHTId8djzjBma6Y+ZlB80eJFTfiHtJHNkVwqX5vB8kFMaWRyqx/Nj/M2oWYASQB5iy8s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C1uIKI2x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C1uIKI2x" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F257C433C7; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:50:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711039830; bh=tNuHZJKyhybA+h0H/rFDTN4oQHxgp+RHik+5RM1pSFA=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=C1uIKI2xevaptJ90Hqq1QUXxuZHAEmTHqvo+FVf/fEqhFKGZqT2ZlLw3u7F0S/g28 hDwkTlc58ISAZxpmvBoQC2eOCtWp3i9ly7hkhhvS+w5E7Qt/5pdd9iruAWfryoUp6L eHMcGYefUvPDxIHevws0UZmC0kp+922W/r8hAlrJaVlGQC1BlWnxAitca2Jx574ZUg SiwW91UlmL3GUJaixS5LwpwNpy0CBTBjdc2rVZ1kT8HJRHsQDmWI+zcvwEhUFOAEGO wDK6vVdnc4Ay/K8aOEgJxrSA7/eNYxLyf0G69iBpBw+KXNwkS/gYx8JzPLBIxQzp6P eGUDJ93F1kw1A== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:50:26 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] Add support for NIST P521 to ecdsa From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Stefan Berger" , "Konstantin Ryabitsev" , "Lukas Wunner" Cc: "Stefan Berger" , , , , , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240312183618.1211745-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20240320-quirky-truthful-manul-da6eb9@lemur> In-Reply-To: On Thu Mar 21, 2024 at 6:36 PM EET, Stefan Berger wrote: > >=20 > > Putting tested-by to every possible patch only degrades the quality > > of the commit log. > > I would still be interested how one would test individual patches in a=20 > series so they are worthy of a Tested-by tag. I've at least said this twice in this thread. I.e. in a feature you most likely test the uapi so 13/13. In a bug fix you test kernel with and without the patch. Generally you test stuff that you can observe. You can also test non-uapi behaviour with e.g. kprobes or measure e.g. performance, depending on patch. BR, Jarkko