From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
gleb@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: MMU: properly check last spte in fast_page_fault()
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:16:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D2A918AA-2D5F-41D6-8366-35661E2D223D@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130930212308.GA31805@amt.cnet>
On Oct 1, 2013, at 5:23 AM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>
> Unrelated to this patch:
>
> If vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE, no IPI is sent
> by kvm_flush_remote_tlbs.
Yes.
>
> So how is this supposed to work again?
>
> /*
> * Wait for all vcpus to exit guest mode and/or lockless shadow
> * page table walks.
> */
On the lockless walking path, we change the vcpu->mode to
READING_SHADOW_PAGE_TABLES, so that IPI is needed.
Or i missed your question?
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>
> Patch looks fine.
Thank you, Marcelo!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 10:29 [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: MMU: locklessly wirte-protect Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: MMU: fix the count of spte number Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-08 12:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-08 13:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-08 14:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-08 14:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-08 14:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: MMU: properly check last spte in fast_page_fault() Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-30 21:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-03 6:16 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-30 22:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-03 6:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: MMU: flush tlb if the spte can be locklessly modified Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: MMU: flush tlb out of mmu lock when write-protect the sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-30 23:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-03 6:46 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: MMU: update spte and add it into rmap before dirty log Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: MMU: redesign the algorithm of pte_list Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: MMU: introduce nulls desc Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: MMU: introduce pte-list lockless walker Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-08 12:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-16 12:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-16 13:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-16 15:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: MMU: initialize the pointers in pte_list_desc properly Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: MMU: reintroduce kvm_mmu_isolate_page() Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: MMU: allow locklessly access shadow page table out of vcpu thread Xiao Guangrong
2013-10-08 1:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-08 4:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-10-09 1:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-09 10:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-10-10 1:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-10 12:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-10 16:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-10 19:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-10 21:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-11 5:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-11 20:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-12 5:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-14 19:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-15 3:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-15 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-10-16 0:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-10-16 9:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-16 20:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: MMU: locklessly write-protect the page Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: MMU: clean up spte_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: MMU: use rcu functions to access the pointer Xiao Guangrong
2013-09-15 10:26 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: MMU: locklessly wirte-protect Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D2A918AA-2D5F-41D6-8366-35661E2D223D@gmail.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®