From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AFD33A6E1 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772109339; cv=none; b=VYQUj9m2y3FHPu0NUhKeI1U5vrzY3XFlaeBCw8RJOK8PRLLUOrlxpuaUIjJQxtlckBn7uUze2ioa13jywsIOH9lFnjGn9LeeQnHVV7kpqfKuGGNG8SMoqINkJ/UVYgsTmtcSuEs70p9EPHvCTQa0FBF1NeXYiodvorQVOvEurug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772109339; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+PcqQIDAuZfQS2K22tZ6CDXuGM5fodDeadGgiEtJb3g=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jRvAnt2VkEBzORU5PsErEGW9eYSSRe3akXZ82msVbpsUu/CGPG8AkLRKS8hbyDSB7GhQNCzR/uwdRvK/fzV6kEr7P86Ot8mBjwtmbKX1VBnzf1S/j06AH/yYizkXOW+sumy8nf3u7MtsP1yU7bv/Ic2mvs4oaWUxxeKvA9WKzvw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Bz6KgPE6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Bz6KgPE6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31961C116C6; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:35:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772109338; bh=+PcqQIDAuZfQS2K22tZ6CDXuGM5fodDeadGgiEtJb3g=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bz6KgPE6aNb8iOkWdUzkidXJGcPpbnr/ZG76+ZwSxtFLJsQpx/XeEy9iYXnpwm+cJ NNrJr8joLK25hDs7/ZzhazMNrh1KlD2SGMUar/NefEnmc39KdyIgYNWxoHZ9pzPlmV bJCwKLhiDzoDFNNRd7UosZrwhKi4ifnOsmAmw3NvYUtX/HeFb2HsN+D/M3DdKbf3sR RhhCmrDRbC7hskhAABnutRcq7rDxpXZ4gsqqB1m1tf32xJU4MoeP7kwkq3QEIeZFu9 2Gwex0Jb877h+1m1L6+DmA/DzAx7/XdjfMWAYuinpmquc7t0x+p7sJgoz8Z0gYc7Lv EFHBfTXuBBnFA== Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:35:33 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Anup Patel CC: Anup Patel , Himanshu Chauhan , Conor Dooley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, shuah@kernel.org Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH_v3_1/2=5D_riscv=3A_Introduce_s?= =?US-ASCII?Q?upport_for_hardware_break/watchpoints?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20260223044918.1359983-1-himanshu.chauhan@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260223044918.1359983-2-himanshu.chauhan@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260223-mouth-plated-50294c7a6ac0@wendy> <20260224-likewise-rimless-151f6a12b092@wendy> <20260225-compress-moody-400a1e2f46fb@spud> <20260226-shifty-stingily-acfd81c08fde@spud> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26 February 2026 11:40:51 GMT, Anup Patel w= rote: >On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 2:14=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley = wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 11:05:14AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:31=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:33:27AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: >> > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 1:33=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 09:30:24AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrot= e: >> > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:19:17AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan = wrote: >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Did you miss the comment at the end about the remaining TODOs? >> > > > >> > > > No=2E As I mentioned in the cover letter, the ptrace support is n= ot >> > > > implemented here=2E I am actively working on it and these are >> > > > implemented in ptrace work=2E >> > > > The test is done using the perf events directly=2E The second pat= ch in >> > > > this patch set has the test application=2E >> > > >> > > Then the patchset should still be marked RFC, since it is not finis= hed=2E >> > >> > Wow! let's all of us post only large series (covering multiple featur= es) >> > which are difficult to review instead of making life easier for revie= wers >> > through incremental series which make gradual progress over-time=2E >> >> Where did I say don't post it? In fact, marking it RFC *requires* >> posting it=2E Don't put words in my mouth=2E >> > >Well, I disagree with you suggestion of marking this series as RFC=2E >This series has well defined scope and is based on ratified spec=2E >A series need not cover all possible features to be a regular >non-RFC patches=2E > >Don't throw your RFC related opinions pointlessly=2E It's clearly not pointless when there are unexplained TODOs=2E Seeing to-do items is absolutely sufficient grounds to question them, and = when the response doesn't clearly explain why they're okay, my thoughts abo= ut RFC are reasonable - even if ultimately they might be incorrect=2E Instead of being passive aggressive with me, you could have just explained= why it was okay=2E