From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: jane.chu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
kernel@pankajraghav.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mcgrof@kernel.org, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:33:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D66CC340-262F-4CBD-A64A-FC3D809716B7@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57d9aa32-2fc8-48d2-b68b-3308c7d58125@oracle.com>
On 2 Oct 2025, at 1:23, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:
> On 10/1/2025 7:04 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2025, at 20:38, Zi Yan wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Oct 2025, at 19:58, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Zi Yan,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/30/2025 9:51 PM, syzbot wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
>>>>> lost connection to test machine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit: d8795075 mm/huge_memory: do not change split_huge_page..
>>>>> git tree: https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci
>>>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17ce96e2580000
>>>>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=714d45b6135c308e
>>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6367ea2fdab6ed46056
>>>>> compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
>>>>> userspace arch: arm64
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: no patches were applied.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>>>
>>>> My hunch is that
>>>> https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci
>>>> alone is not enough. Perhaps on ARM64, the page cache pages of /dev/nullb0 in
>>> Yes, it only has the first patch, which fails a split if it cannot be
>>> split to the intended order (order-0 in this case).
>>>
>>>
>>>> the test case are probably with min_order > 0, therefore THP split fails, as the console message show:
>>>> [ 200.378989][T18221] Memory failure: 0x124d30: recovery action for unsplit thp: Failed
>>>>
>>>> With lots of poisoned THP pages stuck in the page cache, OOM could trigger too soon.
>>>
>>> That is my understanding too. Thanks for the confirmation.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think it's worth to try add the additional changes I suggested earlier -
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com/
>>>>
>>>> So that in the madvise HWPOISON cases, large huge pages are splitted to smaller huge pages, and most of them remain usable in the page cache.
>>>
>>> Yep, I am going to incorporate your suggestion as the second patch and make
>>> syzbot check it again.
>>
>>
>>
<snip>
>
> There is a bug here,
>
> if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, new_order, false) || new_order) {
> res = -EHWPOISON;
> kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio); <---
>
> If try_to_split_thp_page() succeeded on min_order, 'folio' should be retaken: folio = page_folio(page) before moving on to kill_procs_now().
#syz test: https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order_and_opt_memory_failure_v2-for-kernelci
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:22 syzbot
2025-09-24 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 15:03 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 15:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 16:33 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 17:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 17:52 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 12:02 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-25 14:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 16:23 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-25 16:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 17:26 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-29 11:08 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-29 15:20 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 16:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-01 1:51 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01 2:06 ` syzbot
2025-10-01 2:13 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01 4:51 ` syzbot
2025-10-01 23:58 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 0:38 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 2:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 2:50 ` syzbot
2025-10-02 5:23 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 13:54 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:47 ` jane.chu
2025-10-09 7:39 ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-10 15:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:54 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:45 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-03 4:02 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:33 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-10-02 19:09 ` syzbot
2025-10-02 7:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-29 17:29 ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 17:49 ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 18:23 ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 20:15 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 20:52 ` jane.chu
2025-09-30 2:51 ` Miaohe Lin
2025-09-30 4:35 ` jane.chu
2025-09-30 6:31 ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-01 18:15 ` jane.chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D66CC340-262F-4CBD-A64A-FC3D809716B7@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®