mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: jane.chu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:33:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D66CC340-262F-4CBD-A64A-FC3D809716B7@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57d9aa32-2fc8-48d2-b68b-3308c7d58125@oracle.com>

On 2 Oct 2025, at 1:23, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:

> On 10/1/2025 7:04 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2025, at 20:38, Zi Yan wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Oct 2025, at 19:58, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Zi Yan,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/30/2025 9:51 PM, syzbot wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
>>>>> lost connection to test machine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit:         d8795075 mm/huge_memory: do not change split_huge_page..
>>>>> git tree:       https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci
>>>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17ce96e2580000
>>>>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=714d45b6135c308e
>>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6367ea2fdab6ed46056
>>>>> compiler:       Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
>>>>> userspace arch: arm64
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: no patches were applied.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>>>
>>>> My hunch is that
>>>> https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci
>>>> alone is not enough.  Perhaps on ARM64, the page cache pages of /dev/nullb0 in
>>> Yes, it only has the first patch, which fails a split if it cannot be
>>> split to the intended order (order-0 in this case).
>>>
>>>
>>>> the test case are probably with min_order > 0, therefore THP split fails, as the console message show:
>>>> [  200.378989][T18221] Memory failure: 0x124d30: recovery action for unsplit thp: Failed
>>>>
>>>> With lots of poisoned THP pages stuck in the page cache, OOM could trigger too soon.
>>>
>>> That is my understanding too. Thanks for the confirmation.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think it's worth to try add the additional changes I suggested earlier -
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com/
>>>>
>>>> So that in the madvise HWPOISON cases, large huge pages are splitted to smaller huge pages, and most of them remain usable in the page cache.
>>>
>>> Yep, I am going to incorporate your suggestion as the second patch and make
>>> syzbot check it again.
>>
>>
>>

<snip>

>
> There is a bug here,
>
> 		if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, new_order, false) || new_order) {
> 			res = -EHWPOISON;
> 			kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);  <---
>
> If try_to_split_thp_page() succeeded on min_order, 'folio' should be retaken:  folio = page_folio(page) before moving on to kill_procs_now().

#syz test: https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order_and_opt_memory_failure_v2-for-kernelci

Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 16:22 syzbot
2025-09-24 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 15:03   ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 15:35     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 16:33       ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 17:05         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 17:52           ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 12:02             ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-25 14:24               ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 16:23                 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-25 16:48                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 17:26                     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-29 11:08                 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-29 15:20                   ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 16:13                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-01  1:51                     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01  2:06                       ` syzbot
2025-10-01  2:13                       ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01  4:51                         ` syzbot
2025-10-01 23:58                           ` jane.chu
2025-10-02  0:38                             ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02  2:04                               ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02  2:50                                 ` syzbot
2025-10-02  5:23                                 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 13:54                                   ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:47                                     ` jane.chu
2025-10-09  7:39                                       ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-10 15:25                                         ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:54                                     ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:45                                       ` Zi Yan
2025-10-03  4:02                                         ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:33                                   ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-10-02 19:09                                     ` syzbot
2025-10-02  7:25                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-29 17:29                   ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 17:49                     ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 18:23                       ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 20:15                         ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 20:52                           ` jane.chu
2025-09-30  2:51                         ` Miaohe Lin
2025-09-30  4:35                           ` jane.chu
2025-09-30  6:31                             ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-01 18:15                               ` jane.chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D66CC340-262F-4CBD-A64A-FC3D809716B7@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®