From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Julien Freche <jfreche@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] vmw_balloon: bump version number
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:17:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6E44AB3-39AB-41C2-83E3-0ABC910B66BE@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190206210605.GA4599@kroah.com>
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 1:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:39:52PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 8:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:13:31PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>> Following recent changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> index f8240b87df22..7294f305753f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>>>>
>>>> MODULE_AUTHOR("VMware, Inc.");
>>>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VMware Memory Control (Balloon) Driver");
>>>> -MODULE_VERSION("1.5.0.0-k");
>>>> +MODULE_VERSION("1.6.0.0-k");
>>>
>>> Please just drop this pointless line, it means nothing and is always out
>>> of date. It's been removed from many other drivers, and I really don't
>>> want to see it come back.
>>>
>>> Your driver "version" is the kernel version, full stop. That's all you
>>> need to ever worry about.
>>
>> I understand, and I will inform those who asked for the version bump.
>>
>> Having said that, I do not see a reference for this policy. I understand
>> that you removed the MODULE_VERSION from in-kernel drivers, but I also see
>> that you accepted several drivers last year that used MODULE_VERSION.
>
> I messed up, and will be glad to take patches to remove them. Usually
> that's the last thing I remember to check when reviewing patches, I
> can always use the help :)
>
> Also, I only received 1 patch in this series, did something go wrong
> with the sending of it?
Err. Thanks for letting me know. I guess that that I messed up the git-send
trying to avoid cc’ing patch author who got his email address deactivated.
I will resend.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-06 5:13 [PATCH 0/6] vmw_balloon: 64-bit limit support, compaction, shrinker Nadav Amit
2019-02-06 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] vmw_balloon: bump version number Nadav Amit
2019-02-06 16:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-06 20:39 ` Nadav Amit
2019-02-06 21:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-06 22:17 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2019-02-06 17:52 ` [PATCH 0/6] vmw_balloon: 64-bit limit support, compaction, shrinker Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-06 18:05 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6E44AB3-39AB-41C2-83E3-0ABC910B66BE@vmware.com \
--to=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jfreche@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome