From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3124221DAE for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739280584; cv=none; b=AJ4/4ESLMej3aRMSzYZKsnpGxQNon1rncbZ1Wm6lzoT6mfBSPpHpLXKsQySa4GdFyveNPpB7ehPGz6QBC3cA82UIvIT1/Oz5Aht/iV5FFWhR2tFA2+l/zciCLhWsauSr0xu6gB5a88yibPr8JgGZGO0mTXcEcq4oxXeEObA5uVU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739280584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mjpIa2XgFmm6zQMA4pXnY2mees84ECC2FENB0WxODPI=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=YzKP6ICP33TtAiFxu6NlBgsUeD3pWGlV6kCSOS4Y2G03rXooyPTNbPuO2icvFMsU1F3LDIgUMKPaqNRrh6eTNmgGvK1E+tTKmtfZ61+AeUoG5X5OsDiWQn+GZBcxdsYsgCOJqFsDytzpcc6eJ2WVfCrlHK0F+XZFmeOppeFdxE0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=F76PrS/S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="F76PrS/S" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1739280569; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mjpIa2XgFmm6zQMA4pXnY2mees84ECC2FENB0WxODPI=; b=F76PrS/Srf+TRRk4IpALolWISlQCHaKg2b1va2BOB6rNkQcsP1j2VWNnabRLhH+dz3q0gJ CXcMXeItjojp36cU3MVppUnZPhrnenfB5ABnwjugZZpa4xAaYr7Bs/mtM+bMyeUOAArSzg kT0mBGGTr4yHcAPRvb7sTImS2xszkZvUCqRIe33uc8lqBh2Nxa+AaftUYu89Ez4ZSFsNR1 4q2Qy2Rq5po7/cY6G68tPzhOanFUwjAyqdHBamjx0VayA75QmjMBNMctRAW4AvznsidD2Q OW1uRE1SbELrVvXINRCoO+wlPKP+YBQ71S0s28xgjC0Mh7nsBkVRqcFdAlSQGw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=7740a347bdd2a901409a1a992506960e6d5f504e0ca01f0028a982de32c2; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:29:14 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: firmware: add google,gs101-acpm-ipc X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , =?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9_Draszik?= , "Tudor Ambarus" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Alim Akhtar" , "Jassi Brar" References: <20250211-gs101-acpm-v8-0-01d01f522da6@linaro.org> <20250211-gs101-acpm-v8-1-01d01f522da6@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --7740a347bdd2a901409a1a992506960e6d5f504e0ca01f0028a982de32c2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 1:05 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 11/02/2025 13:02, Andr=C3=A9 Draszik wrote: >> On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 11:57 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >>> And then I shall s/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");/ >>> everywhere as "GPL" indicates [GNU Public License v2 or later]. >>=20 >> No, please don't, see Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. > For the rest of suggestions here I also recommend rereading docs. I > don't get why we need to change "GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause", but maybe I > miss some docs. Whatever SPDX recommends is irrelevant if kernel > recommends for example something else, so be sure you make it aligned > with actual kernel preference. Unfortunately, ``Documentation/process/license-rules.rst`` and ``LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0`` are not in 'sync', but I guess that's (potentially) a discussion for another ML. TL;DR: ``license-rules.rst`` says "GPL-2.0" while the license file allows both. References: 9376ff9ba298 ("LICENSES/GPL2.0: Add GPL-2.0-only/or-later as valid identifi= ers") https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180422220833.078058446@linutronix.de/ (which mentions specifying the SPDX version, but that didn't get implemented) *sigh* --7740a347bdd2a901409a1a992506960e6d5f504e0ca01f0028a982de32c2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZ6tQsgAKCRDXblvOeH7b bkINAP4+7weuoA3/bh9F/SLY1BknW+ahnGc5zXCYKj9qsFSqnwD/cZ/OQbjuOQv2 9Mh1NVnF7KOLhSoOL6Rt+VNblLWmiwE= =N8XC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7740a347bdd2a901409a1a992506960e6d5f504e0ca01f0028a982de32c2--