mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu>
To: "zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn" <zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn>,
	"sagi" <sagi@grimberg.me>, "mgurtovoy" <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	"kbusch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "sashal" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"chunguang.xu" <chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:33:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D7QKRU1EXDXJ.K6ZXC4V4ZD68@bsdbackstore.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025021015413817916143@cestc.cn>

On Mon Feb 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM CET, zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn wrote:
> Hello 
>
>     When using the nvme-tcp driver in a storage cluster, the driver may trigger a null pointer causing the host to crash several times.
> By analyzing the vmcore, we know the direct cause is that  the request->mq_hctx was used after free. 
>
> CPU1                                                                   CPU2
>
> nvme_tcp_poll                                                          nvme_tcp_try_send  --failed to send reqrest 13 
>
>     nvme_tcp_try_recv                                                      nvme_tcp_fail_request
>
>         nvme_tcp_recv_skb                                                      nvme_tcp_end_request
>
>             nvme_tcp_recv_pdu                                                      nvme_complete_rq 
>
>                 nvme_tcp_handle_comp                                                   nvme_retry_req -- request->mq_hctx have been freed, is NULL.               
>                     nvme_tcp_process_nvme_cqe                                                                                    
>
>                         nvme_complete_rq
>
>                             nvme_end_req
>
>                                   blk_mq_end_request

Taking a step back. Let's take a different approach and try to avoid the
double completion.

The problem here is that apparently we received a nvme_tcp_rsp capsule
from the target, meaning that the command has been processed (I guess
the capsule has an error status?)

So maybe only part of the command has been sent?
Why we receive the rsp capsule at all? Shouldn't this be treated as a fatal
error by the controller?

Maurizio

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-12 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10  7:41 zhang.guanghui
2025-02-10 10:01 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-10 10:24   ` Max Gurtovoy
2025-02-10 11:16     ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-10 11:34       ` Max Gurtovoy
2025-02-10 16:40     ` Maurizio Lombardi
     [not found]       ` <CAAO4dAWdsMjYMp9jdWXd_48aG0mTtVpRONqjJJ1scnc773tHzg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-11  8:04         ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-12  8:11           ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12  8:23             ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12  8:52             ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12  9:47               ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-12 10:28                 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 11:14                   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 11:47                     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 15:33 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2025-02-12 16:07   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-13  2:04     ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-17  7:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-20  8:20   ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-07 10:10   ` Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request【请注意,邮件由sagigrim@gmail.com代发】 zhang.guanghui
2025-03-11 10:52     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-03-13  1:48       ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-13  7:51         ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-13  8:18           ` zhang.guanghui
     [not found]             ` <2025031316313196627826@cestc.cn>
2025-03-13  9:01               ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-03-13  8:38           ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-28  9:24       ` Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request zhang.guanghui
2025-04-01 12:11         ` Maurizio Lombardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D7QKRU1EXDXJ.K6ZXC4V4ZD68@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --to=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --cc=chunguang.xu@shopee.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®